European startups: How not to raise capital in the US

&#62; You probably haven’t gone to Stanford and MIT<p>Ahh right, we must be all dumbasses then.<p>One day I was watching a presentation about programming languages. I thought it was for high schoolers, although the teacher seemed to be exceedingly good, he was talking in a style which assumed approx the same amount of IT knowledge my non-programmer high school 3rd grader little brother has.<p>It was a Stanford class.

&#62; You probably haven’t gone to Stanford and MIT. &#62; You probably didn't work in a major successful US startup. &#62; You probably don’t have many mutual connections with the investor.<p>That would seem to apply to most people in the US as well.

&#62; If you’re a European and work in tech in San Francisco, every summer you’ll be inundated with dozens of emails from friends, contacts and unknown European entrepreneurs who will ask you for advice and introductions to US investors for their classic VC fundraising trip.<p>Possibly due to a biased sample, the post exaggerates the attractiveness of the US for skilled Europeans founders.

I run a venture-funded European startup. Raising in the US didn't cross my mind at any stage of our Series A. European money is just as good as US money. This post applies to the 5% of dross European startups who think the grass is greener in San Francisco.

&#62; You probably haven’t gone to Stanford and MIT.<p>Queue out X% of startup people in the United States. You know one common quality of great entrepreneurs? They're really good at getting into and paying for elite colleges with sub-10% acceptance rates.<p>In fact, why doesn't everyone who hasn't gone to Stanford or MIT just smack themselves in the head, abandon their startups, and apply for low-level janitorial positions. Clearly they weren't born intelligent and able to start a startup, otherwise they would have gone to Stanford and MIT where all smart startup people are able to go when they turn 18.

&#62; You probably haven’t gone to Stanford and MIT<p>Oh dear ...<p>I understand that this was the author's honest appraisal of the thought processes of potential investors within the SF bay area community. I also understand that it is probably a true reflection of investor attitude. Lastly I understand that the sentiment behind it is total c<i></i>p - with about as much foundation in the truth as a bouncy castle has in rock and mortar.<p>Whether merely perceived or actual, the astonishing arrogance of some Americans is hurting their image.

Any statistics on what % of successful YC candidates that went to Ivy League schools? I'm going to assume there is a bias that people who go to prestigious Ivy are more likely to apply to prestigious programs like YC so probably a high percentage.

I think holds for founders from all countries outside of the US.

Haha I barely started reading the article and I already trip over this sentence in one of the first paragraphs: "I believe I now have a statistically significant pool of data and experiences to analyze". Clearly somebody misunderstood something. Perhaps it is time we stop using terms we don't understand.