TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Great Brazilian Sat-Hack Crackdown

59 点作者 ffernan大约 16 年前
CAMPINAS, Brazil — On the night of March 8, cruising 22,000 miles above the Earth, U.S. Navy communications satellite FLTSAT-8 suddenly erupted with illicit activity. Jubilant voices and anthems crowded the channel on a junkyard's worth of homemade gear from across vast and silent stretches of the Amazon: Ronaldo, a Brazilian soccer idol, had just scored his first goal with the Corinthians.<p>It was a party that won't soon be forgotten. Ten days later, Brazilian Federal Police swooped in on 39 suspects in six states in the largest crackdown to date on a growing problem here: illegal hijacking of U.S. military satellite transponders.<p>"This had been happening for more than five years," says Celso Campos, of the Brazilian Federal Police. "Since the communication channel was open, not encrypted, lots of people used it to talk to each other."<p>The practice is so entrenched, and the knowledge and tools so widely available, few believe the campaign to stamp it out will be quick or easy.<p>Much of this country's population lives in remote areas beyond the reach of cellphone coverage, making American satellites an ideal, if illegal, communications option. The problem goes back more than a decade, to the mid-1990s, when Brazilian radio technicians discovered they could jump on the UHF frequencies dedicated to satellites in the Navy's Fleet Satellite Communication system, or FLTSATCOM. They've been at it ever since.<p>Truck drivers love the birds because they provide better range and sound than ham radios. Rogue loggers in the Amazon use the satellites to transmit coded warnings when authorities threaten to close in. Drug dealers and organized criminal factions use them to coordinate operations.<p>Today, the satellites, which pirates called "Bolinha" or "little ball," are a national phenomenon.<p>"It's impossible not to find equipment like this when we catch an organized crime gang," says a police officer involved in last month's action.<p>The crackdown, called "Operation Satellite," was Brazil's first large-scale enforcement against the problem. Police followed coordinates provided by the U.S. Department of Defense and confirmed by Anatel, Brazil's FCC. Among those charged were university professors, electricians, truckers and farmers, the police say. The suspects face up to four years and jail, but are more likely to be fined if convicted.

3 条评论

patio11大约 16 年前
If you can triangulate them then the solution seems fairly simple: automate the triangulation, and have a pre-recorded voice respond to transmissions randomly with a stern command in Portuguese: This is the United States Navy. You are transmitting on a restricted channel. Your location is <i>blah</i>. Cease communication via this channel immediately or we will take appropriate measures to protect our national security.<p>I think it would be more effective if you made the monitor random than if you made it deterministic and perfectly effective. If every transmission got the reprimand, it would sound like a joke. If it happens infrequently enough then the users will react like OH MY GOD THE FLOORBOARD IS CREAKING HOLY "#$"&#38; THERE ARE MARINES OUTSIDE MY WINDOW. (Google "panopticon". Yay, I actually learned something in literary criticism!)<p>Incidentally: even if you can't triangulate them accurately, I'm going to bet that an illiterate truck driver told he was broadcasting from 38.89767 N, 77.03655 E would believe you. Even though he is most probably not attempting satellite piracy from the Oval Office.
评论 #570353 未加载
评论 #570458 未加载
评论 #570707 未加载
tsally大约 16 年前
If a bunch of impoverished Brazilians can use these satellites to communicate, is a Denial of Service possible if organized by a well funded group? I admit I don't know as much about this type of technology as I would like. I assume they could saturate every frequency?<p>Also, a thought to fix this problem. How much money do you think the US is going to spend to try to crack down on the hijackers? How much money do you think it would take to build a decent infrastructure to remove the motivation of hijacking? The numbers certainly are not equal, but they're probably closer than you'd think.
评论 #570697 未加载
forinti大约 16 年前
This is why Brazil has the safest banking system in the world: Brazilians are unruly and the police is ineffective.
评论 #570956 未加载