TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

What Nikola Tesla vs. VCs video says about the state of Silicon Valley

108 点作者 mkuhn将近 12 年前

8 条评论

nickpinkston将近 12 年前
If you want to hear how Tesla, Edison, etc. actually went about funding / building their companies - check out: "American Genesis"<p>It's a history of the human / social part of this period of technology. So interesting to hear about J.P. Morgan essentially angel investing in Edison / Tesla + all the other unknowns like Elmer Sperry, etc.<p>[1] <a href="http://www.amazon.com/American-Genesis-Invention-Technological-Enthusiasm/dp/0226359271/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&#38;ie=UTF8&#38;qid=1369077550&#38;sr=1-1&#38;keywords=american+genesis" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/American-Genesis-Invention-Technologic...</a>
评论 #5741081 未加载
NoPiece将近 12 年前
<i>They’re all looking for the next Facebook or the next Twitter, but no one wants to look for the next Juniper or the next Intel or even the next ARM.</i><p>The author didn't substantiate this claim. The only actual example he came with was the Tesla hypothetical. I'm sure it is true that there is a lot of money chasing easy short term ideas right now, but his only real world example of clean tech shows there is money out there for big ideas. Even bad big ideas. I'd like this article if it were actually about some companies with big ideas who needed money and couldn't get it.
johnrob将近 12 年前
The internet and mobile have created opportunities to make large amounts of money faster than ever. You can't blame the VCs for choosing a quick billion vs a slow billion. Along the same lines, the referenced VC deals of the past (Khosla + Juniper) were not comparing those opportunities with the hyper growth startups that we see today.
justinhj将近 12 年前
You change tack not tact although maybe some companies should change both
kepano将近 12 年前
This begs the question, how did Tesla actually do it? Ultimately he was driven by the inventions themselves, not the business models. This was his genius and his failure.<p>Licensing the patents worked but it's also worth looking at Tesla's relationship with George Westinghouse who became a patron more than an investor.<p>What's the avenue for a Nikola Tesla today?
评论 #5739671 未加载
评论 #5739230 未加载
评论 #5739257 未加载
评论 #5742364 未加载
评论 #5739453 未加载
justhw将近 12 年前
If you're wondering, here is the kickstarter to the video. <a href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/dorrian/a-statue-of-nikola-tesla-in-the-silicon-valley" rel="nofollow">http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/dorrian/a-statue-of-niko...</a>
jk4930将近 12 年前
62% unrelated: Nikola Tesla vs Thomas Edison (Epic Rap Battes of History):<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJ1Mz7kGVf0" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJ1Mz7kGVf0</a>
michaelochurch将近 12 年前
Venture capitalists these days go on social proof largely because of their career incentives. You don't "make it" as a VC unless you get into a black albatross deal early, and there's one of those per decade. That's why all the horrible note-sharing and co-funding goes on. All the VC resources are chasing the career needs of the agents, not maximizing return on investment (which is impossible to predict anyway).<p>Someone is going to win big by working with the mid-risk/mid-growth "lifestyle" businesses (that currently make most of their money consulting) but it's not going to happen in VC-istan, nor will it be in Silicon Valley or New York. Boston has a shot; I'd also say Austin, Seattle and Chicago are in the running.
评论 #5741343 未加载
评论 #5740038 未加载
评论 #5739239 未加载
评论 #5739704 未加载
评论 #5743085 未加载