TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Hexo – A fast, simple and powerful blog framework

65 点作者 juanfatas大约 12 年前

4 条评论

piranha大约 12 年前
Writing "incredibly fast" and not providing any clues of how fast is it is not exactly the best way to promote an application IMO.<p>Update: okay, it generates simplest site possible with 250 posts in 7 seconds. This is not the worst performance (it's faster than Jekyll), but I won't call this 'incredibly fast'. :\<p>And why the downvote, by the way? Is pointing out statements, which may not hold any value, wrong? Especially if they do not hold any value?
评论 #5767218 未加载
callmeed大约 12 年前
This looks like a nice, Node port of Jekyll. Not really how I prefer to blog.<p>My idea for a blogging platform (maybe even a service), if I ever get to it, would be a combination of <i>Jekyll and Posterous</i>. In other words, you'd have:<p>* A Jekyll dir structure on the server<p>* You write a post via Email<p>* The email is POSTed to the service via MailGun<p>* The service writes a new HTML file in the Jekyll dir and runs `jekyll build`<p>BAM, you have the speed of a static site, the wysiwyg editing features of whatever email client you use, and the ability to post from any computer/phone/tablet (not just one with git configured).
评论 #5766618 未加载
评论 #5767767 未加载
评论 #5766813 未加载
评论 #5769393 未加载
singular大约 12 年前
Seems interesting, I've always appreciated the simplicity of a Jekyll-type approach.<p>Apologies for semi-hijacking to mention it but, I take a slightly different approach in my personal blog (custom, messy code) - I rsync markdown documents to my webserver which are compiled into HTML and put into a redis in-memory collection which the server uses to render the blog. That gives you in-memory caching for free and avoids having a whole bunch of static files having to be generated every time. I use node on the backend and angular on the frontend to allow for a single-page website.<p>Currently the solution involves regenerating all HTML each time files are rsync by a script run remotely via SSH, however I ultimately intend for it to use an inotify-style approach to only import files that have actually changed, running both locally and remotely, so publishing an article need only require you to write some markdown and save it in a particular folder.<p>Though of course all this (currently) requires you to have a server such as linode to which you can rsync + have a remote serving script watch a folder, I mention it so to ask whether anybody would be interested in me cleaning it up and open sourcing it?
评论 #5766923 未加载
C1D大约 12 年前
It would be nice to see some benchmarks, comparing with WordPress and others blogging platforms.
评论 #5767197 未加载