This is the Daily Mail re-hashing a BBC article, but the BBC article kind of missed the point. That article hit the front page of HN about a week ago. Daily Mail's article was just amazingly shallow with no new information.<p>Original paper:<p><a href="http://www.cell.com/current-biology/retrieve/pii/S0960982213004946" rel="nofollow">http://www.cell.com/current-biology/retrieve/pii/S0960982213...</a><p>Some non-paywalled info:<p><a href="http://www.bcs.rochester.edu/courses/crsinf/151/13_CenterSur_2per.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.bcs.rochester.edu/courses/crsinf/151/13_CenterSur...</a>