Javascript Templating Engine Chooser

It's also missing Nunjucks, which works in browser and server, can precompile templates (when done so is really fast), lets you do more logic in templates, has autoescaping, and a bunch of other stuff. Some big project like Mozilla's new Marketplace is using it.<p><a href="https://github.com/jlongster/nunjucks" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/jlongster/nunjucks</a>

It's missing DustJS, which is IMO a strong contender that does well in benchmarks<p><a href="http://linkedin.github.io/dustjs/" rel="nofollow">http://linkedin.github.io/dustjs/</a><p>* Works in the browser and on the server<p>* Pretty fast<p>* logic-less but with a helpers API for when you need more power<p>* pre-compiles templates<p>* has template partials

Is there a way to deselect an option without reloading the page?<p>For example: Under "DOM Structure", once you select "DOM" or "String", you can never go back to seeing all the template options.

Hmmm, I wonder about the reliability of the information, or perhaps reliability is not the right word, maybe completeness would be better.<p>I don't know who Garann is, and I don't use Javascript templating, and yet just by playing with the options on the page I was able to predict that Garann is using with dot.js. A quick Google then confirmed the hypothesis, which makes me think that the options that are available are aimed quite specifically at Garann's use case, and might not be generally applicable.

This is just one of the reasons why I feel developing web apps has gotten harder. While there are a lot of javascript frameworks it is likely two projects pick different routes. It basically means if I need to maintain a project I will have to learn a new javascript library.

Missing several from LinkedIn's throwdown: <a href="http://engineering.linkedin.com/frontend/client-side-templating-throwdown-mustache-handlebars-dustjs-and-more" rel="nofollow">http://engineering.linkedin.com/frontend/client-side-templat...</a>

I'd rather just see a matrix.

Nicely put together :) Might want to hide a feature if the selection makes no difference (re-show when it does have potential to make a difference).<p>Example: Both, Entirety, Fastest, Then it doesn't matter if you say precompiled yes or no.

Helpful to learn about the options, but as soon as I said it was for the client and has to be fast, there were no options remaining.

Also, Swig.<p><a href="http://paularmstrong.github.io/swig/" rel="nofollow">http://paularmstrong.github.io/swig/</a>

I encourage you who have found missing frameworks to submit a pull request instead of posting a comment.

Can't un-choose. If you choose in a particular department you cannot just take the choice away and it filters by it, forcing you to reload the page.

No plain mustache.js<p>What kind of chooser is this?

No option remains for Both, logic-less and fast.

Really surprised knockoutjs isn't mentioned. It is the default templating engine in a default .NET MVC project.

jQote2 missing. In our benchmarks one of the fastest and a lot of features.<p><a href="http://aefxx.com/jquery-plugins/jqote2/" rel="nofollow">http://aefxx.com/jquery-plugins/jqote2/</a>

Great work.

Unreadable font.