TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Simple Universal Time

6 点作者 telmich大约 12 年前

6 条评论

claudius大约 12 年前
First of all, there is already the Swatch Internet Time[0], which is a very similar concept (and similarly underused).<p>But more importantly, you would have to redefine the length of a second in order to keep days the same length. Redefining the length of a second is <i>not</i> <i>good</i>. Really, no.<p>Then there is the problem that this is not really a sensible metric time – 10 hours, 100 minutes and 100 seconds each? Frankly, that's stupid – ideally, you want the conversion factors to always be the same, ideally 10³. The swatch time mentioned above got this right with 1000 minutes (‘.beats’)/day, if absolutely necessary, you could probably also go with 100 quarter-hours/day and 100 seconds/quarter-hour, with 1 new second = 8.64 old seconds, or 1 old second ~ 0.12 new seconds.<p>The underlying problem here is that time lengths are intrinsically non-metric and there is little to no way to consistently make a year and a day both ‘metric’, simply because nature doesn’t require them to be. The same goes for nearly all other SI units – the equator is 40 Mm, the average height of a human is ~2m, a human weighs 80kg, not 100kg (and really, <i>k</i>g as the base unit?!).<p>[0] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatch_Internet_Time" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatch_Internet_Time</a>
评论 #5803442 未加载
attheodo大约 12 年前
Is it only me or this sounds like a terrible idea? Maybe it will eventually be more productive but during the transition phase, there'll be mayhem. Not to mention all the unusable clocks, hardware etc that'll have to be completely scraped.
评论 #5804165 未加载
nathan_long大约 12 年前
Previously tried in the late 1700s:<p>"Decimal time is the representation of the time of day using units which are decimally related. This term is often used to refer specifically to French Revolutionary Time, which divides the day into 10 decimal hours, each decimal hour into 100 decimal minutes and each decimal minute into 100 decimal seconds"<p>It sounds quite practical, but one reason we have 60-based time and 360 degrees in a circle is that they divide evenly so many ways. Eg, 60 minutes divides evenly by 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, so it's easy to measure a third of an hour or 1/6 of a circle.
telmich将近 12 年前
I've just discovered the C implementation of SUT at <a href="https://github.com/benkaiser/sut.c" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/benkaiser/sut.c</a> - nice to see it working on the commandline :-)
greensand大约 12 年前
Even if this was well thought out it would never catch on.
评论 #5804178 未加载
telmich大约 12 年前
claudius, you are right, there is swatch beat. It actually tries to solve the problem different. The problem with beat is that humans are used to hours/minutes/seconds. That's why SUT reuses this principle.