TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

DNSimple target of DDoS attack

64 点作者 markprovan将近 12 年前

9 条评论

the9to5将近 12 年前
Bravo to the folks at DNSimple for being on top of communications during this time. It's something that they themselves brought up less then a year ago during the Zerigo DDOS (<a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4280515" rel="nofollow">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4280515</a>) so it'd good to see them sticking to it.<p>But it also seems as though the same advice proposed in that thread should have been used by their customers: Namely, utilize multiple DNS providers to mitigate risk, and choose providers with IP anycast. Heck, even setting up your own secondary DNS on a $5/mo cloud server would keep your site up (unless of course your site is the main target of the DDOS).
whafro将近 12 年前
It's not a great long-term solution, but DNSimple has been disabling their ALIAS support, which many Heroku and AWS users are likely to depend on, especially if you use SSL.<p>Short term, keep your ALIAS record and add an additional A record for your root domain pointing to one of the IPs indicated by your hostname. DNSimple says they'll treat the A record as a fallback when ALIAS isn't working, and will return both sets of records when it is (<a href="https://twitter.com/dnsimple/status/341574753276002304" rel="nofollow">https://twitter.com/dnsimple/status/341574753276002304</a>).<p>For the next 3/12/24/96 hours or however long it takes for the threat to subside, this should increase your availability, and the likelihood that your A record will work for that time is probably reasonable. Longer term, you'll want to get rid of the A record.
yesimahuman将近 12 年前
Ah, got bitten by this. Just added Route 53 as redundancy, should have done that a long time ago.
评论 #5813333 未加载
评论 #5814376 未加载
评论 #5813339 未加载
soci将近 12 年前
DNSimple seems the best way to go if you want to host your service with Heroku using a root domain (no www at the beginning of the domain name) [1].<p>Unfortunately, DNSimple is now the weakest layer of our stack. And at <a href="http://KiteBit" rel="nofollow">http://KiteBit</a> we are suffering it right now!<p>[1]<a href="https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/custom-domains#root-domain" rel="nofollow">https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/custom-domains#root-do...</a>)
评论 #5813363 未加载
jwarzech将近 12 年前
Our site (and others) seem to still be working through the 'www' domain. We have had nothing but great experiences with DNSimple up to this point and will probably stay customers, just sort of frustrating as we wait for our domain to resolve to another dns provider as a quick fix...
评论 #5813642 未加载
zrail将近 12 年前
Is anyone else seeing a sustained level of trashy DNS queries to their own servers? I've been seeing a sustained level to mine that's way above normal, for the last few days. I wonder if this is a broader problem than just DNSimple.
评论 #5814709 未加载
评论 #5815417 未加载
thejosh将近 12 年前
This seems to happen quite often to DNS hosts, I remember ClouDNS getting hit often.<p>It's easier to hit these sorts of "smaller player DNS hosts" if the website you want to take down is otherwise protected?
评论 #5813247 未加载
randall将近 12 年前
Anyone know how to make DNS redundant? Is it as simple as adding them as extra nameservers, and then copying all the records? I'm thinking about using Linode's DNS as a failover.
评论 #5813806 未加载
评论 #5813738 未加载
dexcs将近 12 年前
That makes sense. rubygems.org was down for me for a few minutes....
评论 #5813423 未加载