CEO Update

I've said it before and I'll say it again, Pincus is the antithesis of a great CEO. He's basically a scumbag.<p>He scummed (fired) his early employees pre-IPO, he cashed out $200M during the share price peak and left everyone with 6-month options they couldn't exercise, he's referring to hard working employees as "brothers and sisters" in a layoff letter that sounds more like a blog post than a serious document.<p>This guy should be jailed (and Kleiner reviewed for inflating the stock price of this company), he (and his fad driven company) are an awful example of a tech leader and the tech business in general. He's screwed over countless people, investors and the public market, while sitting back laughing at everyone and everything.<p>It's a shame VC's are so quick to invest in the latest fad because of some temporary "traction" for online games lacking any sort f substance and basically being rips of Maxis titles from yesteryear.<p>I've sat in various lunches with VC's where they basically say to each other "hey, we missed out on the Instagram deal, what are the other photo sharing apps in the space we can invest in." It's frightening to see countless idiotic apps get institutional money by basically making derivative products of other crap apps. It's a bad cycle and it needs to end so we don't have more companies like Zynga on the horizon.<p>But I digress, this guy is a major scumbag!

Note the contrast between this and the departure of Groupon's CEO:<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/03/01/groupons-ceo-writes-the-best-resignation-letter-ever/" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/03/01/g...</a><p>Now of course they are about two different types of events, but this letter is missing a number of things:<p>- Down to Earth language: "brothers and sisters" (that we just fired) is over-the-top enough to set off alarm bells in the first few sentences.<p>- No self-reflection or accountability for mistakes. Instead, downsizing is blamed on "scale" not meeting the needs for "leading on mobile." Nothing to do with bad decisions or missteps made by leadership. So what "scale" is needed then? Is Zynga going to fire people until they are a dozen people in a garage so they can "lead" again?<p>- No re-assurance that future downsizing is not imminent. No discussion about specifics of how the evaluation of employees was conducted. No explanation as to how or why an 18% cut is the right size to provide the expected benefits to the company. If no other information has been provided to employees, people at Zynga should all be in fear of losing their jobs based upon this letter.<p>- Instead of explaining in detail why the downsizing is beneficial, the CEO punts and says "But I think we all know this is necessary to move forward." This is not a detailed explanation of the upside to the downsizing, it is a jedi mind trick to cause people to project their own justification for why downsizing was the right move. The only justification given for reducing the size of the company is tautological: we need to reduce company size because we need to scale down the size of the company.

I just realized that generic titles like "An update from our CEO" always indicate bad news. When there's good news they put it straight in the title.

Top ten signs your CEO has been secretly replaced by a droid:<p>Number seven: outputs jargon-filled error messages such as "These moves, while hard to face today, represent a proactive commitment to our mission of connecting the world through games."

"We are saying painful goodbyes to about 18% of our Zynga brothers and sisters." This is where i puked. Seriosly, in whatever company, when you suddenly do not have coworkes, but brothers and sisters - please run, resign, leave. Now!

Am I being too cynical, or is this...<p><i>...our mission of connecting the world through games...</i><p>...just about the most ridiculous bullshit ever? Zynga is about one thing: Profit. That's not necessarily a horribly evil thing (though the ways they go about it might be), but it's most certainly a very clear thing. The only thing they're interested in connecting the world to is their bank accounts.

There's a famous line from the 2008 Batman film "The Dark Knight" in which Bruce Wayne's butler Alfred Pennyworth is trying to explain to Bruce and help him understand the Joker, his new sadistic and unpredictable archenemy:<p><i>"Some men aren't looking for anything logical, like money. They can't be bought, bullied, reasoned or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn."</i> [1]<p>Maybe this makes me a bad person on par with the Joker, but I don't want Mark Pincus to be bought out, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. I just want to watch him burn.<p>(metaphorically speaking, of course)<p>[1] <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efHCdKb5UWc" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efHCdKb5UWc</a>

At the risk of being flamed into oblivion, I support Mark Pincus' letter.<p>I don't think there's an easy way to write a letter like this. It's gruesome but necessary for the press - saying nothing is bad press, saying too much opens you up for attack. Similar to how receiving feedback explaining why you didn't pass an interview opens up liability for the company, being <i>too</i> candid and casual with a letter like this is a liability.<p>This is a shitty part of the business. I'm aware Pincus has made some questionable decisions in the past, and a vocal majority of Hacker News users openly despise him. I'm not going to speak to that - it's irrelevant to this specific letter. But in this particular instance, I think we should reserve judgement.<p>When Andrew Mason stepped down from Groupon, he didn't have much to lose by making a fully transparent letter of resignation. He was widely praised - and rightly so - but Pincus still has to work at and spearhead Zynga. He can't be entirely self-deprecating and down to earth and "mortal" - he is still CEO, and must be a larger than life public figure who is a businessman first, and observer second.<p>That said, I don't think this letter is perfect. It's not, and that's not my point. My point is writing a letter like this is <i>hard</i> - these are always formulaic for a reason.<p>I do not condone his laying off 18% of his workforce, but neither do I condemn it. I don't have the business savvy or inside information to know what would be a best practice for Zynga in this case, but I feel sympathetic to the workers. It sucks to get the news you'll be jobless soon.<p>I guess the takeaway I'm trying to deliver here is - he might have done shitty things in the past (and I'm not absolving him of those things), but I can't see a way this letter deserves to be torn to pieces as though most CEOs could have done a better job. It's a hard letter to write, and I can't imagine he was thrilled to do it. He struggled to convey a message of disappointment and sympathy while maintaining (apparent) solidarity and corporate strength for investors and publicity. It's a <i>very</i> hard line to walk.

<i>We are saying painful goodbyes to about 18% of our Zynga brothers and sisters.</i><p>Not to express an opinion about what Zynga is actually doing, but just from the perspective of usage: if you can be saying a "painful goodbye" to someone, where that "goodbye" takes the form of severance, they are not your brother or your sister. Unless you're fratricidal!

One question, Zynga - Why are you constantly hiring? Even now, even for the positions you're laying off...

When the company has to cut 18% of the workforce, the CEO and management has failed the company, basically.<p>I'm not sure why they are blaming mobile now, when anyone in the tech space could see in 2007 with the iPhone that mobile was going to be a big deal.<p>Also, mobile has ALWAYS been huge to gaming since the game boy or one could argue, the invention of a deck of cards.

"Our FarmVille franchise teams continue to innovate and deliver ground breaking new social experiences like County Fair"<p>I'm not sure he knows what innovation means

Well the stock went from $3.40 pre halt to a low of $2.87 just after the reopen and seems to have settled around $3.10.<p>That's not a great day but it could have been much worse. We'll see what happens going into the close but there seems to be a buy side imbalance currently.

...and those of you who were laid off will no doubt be reading this email on our website as security has shut down your network access and escorted you from the building.

<i>"18% of our Zynga brothers and sisters."</i><p>Who refers to family in statistics? This guy is the anti-christ.

Why doesn't he do the right thing and simply resign his position?<p>He won't be getting much out of his remaining 'brothers and sisters' after stabbing a few hundred of them in the back, a new person would at least have a somewhat clean slate to work from and maybe some hope of turning things around.<p>When this guy calls you his brother or sister it's time to invest in body armor.

Hey, maybe Zynga's next mobile game can be B-Scan 360 with Friends? I think there are 500 or so people who would willing sign up to beta test right away...<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/12/magazine/12PSYCHO.html?_r=0" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/12/magazine/12PSYCHO.html?_r=...</a>

Somebody needs to take responsibility for this. Letting 520 people go is not normal, especially not in the tech industry. It's a disgrace.

For what its worth, this actually seems like pretty good news if you're a Zynga stockholder.

That guy is a scumbag.