This is a terrible article. It is sensationalist. It is undated. When it finally gets round to quoting a scientist, the quote undermines the certainty in the headline: “[cannabis] <i>may offer</i> a <i>new road</i> to therapy against lung cancer”. It is full of references to absent footnotes.<p>Much of the text is lifted directly from a “source” link at the bottom. That document is also full of references to absent footnotes.<p>This isn't even up to the low standards of the Daily Mail.