TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Mass Surveillance in America: A Timeline of Loosening Laws and Practices

123 点作者 andymboyle将近 12 年前

5 条评论

akkartik将近 12 年前
The long gap between 1978 and 2001 seems wrong. Off the top of my head it should mention the 1986 law that exempts email on public servers from the 4th amendment: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Stored_Communications_Act" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Stored_Communications_Act</a>
genericbrandx将近 12 年前
Forgot to add <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Carnivore_(software)" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Carnivore_(software)</a> and possibly <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;ECHELON" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;ECHELON</a>
codeulike将近 12 年前
This shows how it creeps. A change of policy here, a re-interpretation of the rules there, then over the years more and more is hoovered.<p>Be careful when they say things like &quot;the program only looks at calls in which one end of the communication is overseas&quot; (see Bush, 2006 in OP) ... because they distinguish between having the data, and looking at it (see <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=5845258" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=5845258</a>). Hence they claim that its OK for them to posses much more data than they should posses, as long as they only look at the bits they are allowed to look at. Dangerous.
评论 #5855754 未加载
siddboots将近 12 年前
An even more detailed timeline from EFF:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eff.org&#x2F;nsa-spying&#x2F;timeline" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eff.org&#x2F;nsa-spying&#x2F;timeline</a>
alexqgb将近 12 年前
Missing from this timeline is the insidious shift of surveillance power from formal state security to far shadier private contractors.<p>The most damning fact to my mind is that, outside a very small circle, details of NSA spying are &quot;too sensitive&quot; to share with anyone in Congress. Meanwhile, nearly half of Booz Allen Hamilton&#x27;s 25,000 employees have Top Secret clearances.