TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How patio11 redesigned my landing page in front of a live studio audience

80 点作者 SMrF将近 12 年前

11 条评论

thetrumanshow将近 12 年前
Sean Fioritto was the first person I met at BaconBizConf while waiting outside the doors on morning #1. Confident, smart, and altogether friendly guy. I was impressed the level of demonstrated grit he showed when he volunteered his site for a teardown. He was over there just scratching notes away while they punished him. We could all use that kind of grit. More of us would launch great products if we did.<p>Pat Pohler had a teardown too. He should share his lessons learned as well... {Pat Signal}
评论 #5856352 未加载
评论 #5862378 未加载
mbesto将近 12 年前
This is seriously good stuff. Great write-up and sounds like it was a good conf.
SeanDav将近 12 年前
The new is definitely an improvement, but both load fairly slowly - I would try improve this next, or at least allow staged loading so visitors have something to start looking at quickly while the rest loads.
评论 #5856155 未加载
评论 #5856448 未加载
zrail将近 12 年前
This is very useful information for my own project, thanks. BaconBizConf sounds like a really fun conference too.
评论 #5856158 未加载
simonswords82将近 12 年前
Great work, thanks for sharing. I&#x27;d love to have Amy and Patrick critique my site - I reckon I&#x27;ll head to BaconBizConf when it&#x27;s next on.
napoleoncomplex将近 12 年前
Do you have any stats from your analytics you could share? It would be great to see the business side effect.
评论 #5856717 未加载
评论 #5856320 未加载
tocomment将近 12 年前
Looks good but I wasn&#x27;t sure what was being &quot;launched&quot;. Is it software or the book?
评论 #5856287 未加载
oneye将近 12 年前
Thank you for sharing this. I&#x27;ve been working and listening hard and anything that clears up conversion tactics (especially when just handed to me) is gold.<p>Cheers.
cocoflunchy将近 12 年前
I haven&#x27;t read the article yet, but clicking on the before&#x2F;after links got me to say: &quot;Aha, it&#x27;s a book!&quot; in the first second after opening the 2nd link.<p>So even if it&#x27;s only this (which I&#x27;m sure it&#x27;s not), huge improvement in the clarity of the message.<p>Do you have data on the conversion rates before&#x2F;after redesigning the landing page?
评论 #5856725 未加载
thenomad将近 12 年前
All looks very sensible, but I&#x27;d be interested to see a split-test. You never know what will or won&#x27;t convert...
评论 #5856540 未加载
biot将近 12 年前
Up and Down the Ladder of Abstraction: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;worrydream.com&#x2F;#!2&#x2F;LadderOfAbstraction" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;worrydream.com&#x2F;#!2&#x2F;LadderOfAbstraction</a> This should be required reading for every developer.<p>While the redesign looks better, I&#x27;m somewhat turned off because it follows the same design strategies as used by low-quality info products:<p>* Cheesy book shot. At least it&#x27;s not a fake &quot;book generator&quot; box. If this will be delivered as a PDF, why not use the Acrobat logo below a thumbnail preview of the actual cover&#x2F;first page? To me, seeing real content lends credibility.<p>* Thin column of text with bullet points.<p>* Periodic bolded keywords.<p>* The only things it&#x27;s missing are a &quot;P.S.&quot; section and a breakdown of the cost savings over the alternatives.<p>I have no doubt that the reason these things are standard is that they work. However, for me the site has the same look and feel I&#x27;ve seen in many low-quality info product kind of sites. As a result, I&#x27;m immediately more skeptical than I otherwise would be.
评论 #5857166 未加载
评论 #5857500 未加载
评论 #5857610 未加载
评论 #5857504 未加载