TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Review my photo CAPTCHA web service

8 点作者 davidbnewquist大约 16 年前
No, it does not have a "Cats 'n Dogs" theme--not that there's anything wrong with that:)

9 条评论

noaharc大约 16 年前
By what measure is peoplesign more secure? You have 6 choices in 2 menus -- even a robot that is completely stupid will pass 3% of the time.<p>I know that in the past some captchas were broken at rates of 30-40% (Hotmail, I think). Is this really still the case?
评论 #587792 未加载
backwardsbryan大约 16 年前
I downloaded the PHP plugin, and applied for a private key to use the service. The key came immediately, and I've already added the captcha to my site So far I am impressed. <a href="http://www.backwardsparadigm.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.backwardsparadigm.com</a>
coryshaw大约 16 年前
Very cool idea. It does seem faster than most captchas I've used. Would be cool to have the option of only one image, and be able to choose the answer in one click instead of via a drop-down menu. That would make it really fast (though probably less secure)
评论 #587803 未加载
jabberJohn大约 16 年前
Looks easier to read than most CAPTCHAS, though I suppose that you have to speak english to get past it. Could be a good way to learn a language :)<p>Has this stood up to any bot attacks yet? What's the significance of the image discoloration?
评论 #587815 未加载
loumf大约 16 年前
If you draw the labels onto the image (make them each one word) and make the user type them, it's still an easy captcha for a person, but much harder for a bot.<p>If this spreads, it will be worth making a bot for, so that you can spam any of the sites that use it -- right now that bot just needs a few hits on average, and a slightly smarter bot can space them out, so that they are conceivably like commenters.
amr大约 16 年前
This is nice but too big for most forms that use captcha (comments, feedback, etc...).
评论 #587832 未加载
softbuilder大约 16 年前
Remove the word "arguably".<p>You're marketing. Not the time for balanced language.
评论 #588157 未加载
评论 #587994 未加载
jauderho大约 16 年前
This is too hard. Why don't you have some boxes that you can drag and drop to?
javert大约 16 年前
I found a misspelling in a label for a plane image. (The correct selection was 'striped plan' or something like that.)<p>Also, what turned out to be a hydrant looked to me like the leg of a moon lander. (I stared at that thing for a really long time, but I still saw the leg of a moon lander.)
评论 #587847 未加载