TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

China’s Great Uprooting - Moving 250 Million Into Cities

41 点作者 teawithcarl将近 12 年前

5 条评论

tracyma将近 12 年前
(Fuck the GFW, we need vpn to open the nytimes.com)I'm a game developer working in Nanjing. The biggest problem which my generation facing is the housing price. Having a house in city means your childen can take the much much better education in city; means your family can take city-level health-care ... House is not only a house in china, because of the "residence registration system". Only elderly and not competitive people also living in the country which i was born, there're much clear air and safety food but good job , good education. Job and education means future, So many young people working hard in city ,we share one dream. PRC was really hurt during 1966 ~ 1976, we are still on the way of recovery
Volpe将近 12 年前
I always find New York times articles present a pessimistic if not outright incorrect articles on China. They are pushing some agenda of their own.<p>So is urbanisation a bad idea? (if so, why have ALL developed countries done this?)<p>Or is really fast urbanization bad?
contingencies将近 12 年前
I&#x27;ve been in and out of China (mostly in) since late 2001. There are great things about the nation and it&#x27;s simply incredible to behold. Unfortunately, when you travel through 20 kilometres of empty skyscrapers, with many still under construction, you realize there&#x27;s some serious problems with both government policy and the international media&#x27;s mass urbanization notion. Chiefly, development is removing arable land, there&#x27;s nothing for people who come to the city to <i>do</i>, and nobody can afford the new apartments anyway (mostly they are the second, third, tenth or twentieth speculative real estate acquisition of some corrupt official or real estate developer!). As someone who has watched things change over more than a decade, it is <i>very</i> clear to me that the whole economic miracle inside the country has been propped up by state-level creative accounting and is about to enter meltdown. There&#x27;s no two ways about it, China&#x27;s bubble is about to burst. At this point, anything short of broad scale civil unrest will be a good outcome. Best of luck to the Chinese people.
评论 #5887667 未加载
adventured将近 12 年前
This is China&#x27;s attempt to end the artificial labor shortage problems they&#x27;ve been having in urban areas. It&#x27;ll be trivial for China to increase the productivity of their farming massively, given how intentionally backwards it currently is.
评论 #5887195 未加载
CleanedStar将近 12 年前
&quot;The shift is occurring so quickly, and the potential costs are so high, that some fear rural China is once again the site of radical social engineering.&quot;<p>Yesterday Detroit announced it would be defaulting on billions of debt - just the latest chapter of what is happening in that city, in that state, in the entire old Steel Belt. In the 1960s, Detriot was the center of US innovation and the economic engine of the country - we all know what it is nowadays.<p>Why is this not &quot;radical social engineering?&quot; The US unemployment rate is currently at a level that has not been seen since five months in 1992, and before that not since 1984. Why is that not radical social engineering? The amount of hypocrisy and double standards in the US media is mindblowing...
评论 #5887145 未加载
评论 #5887712 未加载
评论 #5887725 未加载
评论 #5887280 未加载