At a fundamental level the questions we have to answer are:<p><pre><code> What does it mean to be free?
What is the proper role of government in that context?
What do we allow government to do in that context? What are their limits?
</code></pre>
This, in a way, is what I feel is lost.<p>As a simple example: Why is it that a total stranger (TSA) can touch every part of your body and even have you strip searched just because you are travelling? Why is it that I, as a parent, can't tell that person to keep his/her hands off my little girl? What happened to the presumption of innocence?<p>At any US airport you are presumed guilty and have to demonstrate your innocence by being subject to search and seizure (swiss army knives, shampoo, etc. taken away --your property).<p>This TSA problem is an analog of the surveiilance problem. The vast majority of the people logging 1.6 billion person-trips per year [1] are not terrorists. Yet, 100% of them are presumed guilty and subject to search and seizure. And we allow it.<p>Now we have a situation where 100% of Americans are presumed to be potential terrorists in the future [2]. Based on that
We now justify logging and tracking your every move and every communication.<p>Steve Wozniac is right, this is what we were told others did to their population, not us. We were above that, better than that. Right.<p>[1] <a href="http://www.ustravel.org/sites/default/files/page/2009/11/US_Travel_Answer_Sheet_March_2013.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.ustravel.org/sites/default/files/page/2009/11/US_...</a><p>[2] Senator Dianne Feinstein explained that we need this data in case someone becomes a terrorist in the future