TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Adblock Plus “typo correction” feature adds affiliate IDs to links

167 点作者 AlexanderHektor将近 12 年前

37 条评论

bad_user将近 12 年前
I cannot verify the claims, but I&#x27;ll state the reasons once again about why I&#x27;m not using ad blockers:<p>1) free websites and web services need revenue and as long as the ads are tasteful, I don&#x27;t mind them<p>2) I actually want websites to annoy me with lots of stupid ads, as I want to stop using such websites, because I want to reward publishers that don&#x27;t do that<p>Ad blockers are trying to fix a symptom of the disease and in doing so they only help spreading and growing that disease.
评论 #5946319 未加载
评论 #5946324 未加载
评论 #5946325 未加载
评论 #5946110 未加载
评论 #5946164 未加载
评论 #5946772 未加载
评论 #5946274 未加载
评论 #5947373 未加载
评论 #5947387 未加载
评论 #5947196 未加载
评论 #5947168 未加载
评论 #5946247 未加载
评论 #5947958 未加载
评论 #5946022 未加载
评论 #5947167 未加载
评论 #5946084 未加载
评论 #5946739 未加载
rmk2将近 12 年前
&gt; Fuenfzehn Mitarbeiter, davon zwei Geschaeftsfuehrer, weitere Stellenanzeigen sind geschaltet, Bueros im Koelner Clusterhaus? Und das einzige Produkt ist eine kostenlose Browser-Erweiterung? Wie kann das funktionieren?<p>Fifteen employees, two of those managers, further job ads are taken out, offices in Cologne&#x27;s Clusterhaus? And the only product is a free of charge browser extension? How does that work?<p>Additionally, this part seems important as well:<p>&gt; Viel wichtiger: das ist also Till Faidas Verstaendnis von akzeptablen Werbeanzeigen: gefakte Testberichte und Auszeichnungen, pseudoneutrale Bewertungen auf anonymisierten Blogs. Artikel, geschrieben von der PR-Abteilung und Geschaeftsfuehrung eines Unternehmens, suchmaschinenoptimierter Content-Dreck fuer das eigene Produkt. Scam nennt man sowas in Fachkreisen!<p>More importantly: so this is Till Faida&#x27;s understanding of acceptable advertisements: faked test reports and awards, pseudoneutral ratings on anonymised blogs. Articles, written by the PR-department and by the management of a company, search-engine-optimised content-dreck [i.e. crud] for their own product. Expert circles tend to call this scam!<p>[the translation isn&#x27;t the prettiest but hopefully quite close to the original in both meaning and intent]<p>[edit] The whole &quot;mafia&quot; argument seems to stem from these questionable practices of &quot;anonymous&quot; and thus seemingly neutral feedback, originating from within the company itself.<p>[edit 2] fixed first translation, since I forgot the half-sentence &quot;weitere [...]&quot;
mikejarema将近 12 年前
Interestingly, Amazon is changing the terms of their Associates program to (among other things) specifically prohibit browser plugins from being eligible for sales commissions:<p><pre><code> 7. Except as agreed between you and us in a separate written agreement referencing this Participation Requirement, you will not use any Content or Special Link, or otherwise link to the Amazon Site, on or in connection with: a. any client-side software application (e.g., a browser plug-in, helper object, toolbar, extension, or component or any other application executable or installable by an end user) on any device, including computers, mobile phones, tablets, or other handheld devices; </code></pre> - <a href="https://affiliate-program.amazon.com/gp/associates/help/operating/compare?ref_=pe_173690_30619550" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;affiliate-program.amazon.com&#x2F;gp&#x2F;associates&#x2F;help&#x2F;oper...</a>
评论 #5946064 未加载
nwh将近 12 年前
Google cache: <a href="https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.mobilegeeks.de%2Fadblock-plus-undercover-einblicke-in-ein-mafioeses-werbenetzwerk%2F&amp;oq=cache%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.mobilegeeks.de%2Fadblock-plus-undercover-einblicke-in-ein-mafioeses-werbenetzwerk%2F&amp;aqs=chrome.0.69i57j69i58.2627j0&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;espv=205&amp;ie=UTF-8" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;webcache.googleusercontent.com&#x2F;search?q=cache%3Ahttp...</a><p>Google translated Google cache: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&amp;sl=de&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fwebcache.googleusercontent.com%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dcache%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.mobilegeeks.de%2Fadblock-plus-undercover-einblicke-in-ein-mafioeses-werbenetzwerk%2F%26oq%3Dcache%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.mobilegeeks.de%2Fadblock-plus-undercover-einblicke-in-ein-mafioeses-werbenetzwerk%2F%26aqs%3Dchrome.0.69i57j69i58.2627j0%26sourceid%3Dchrome%26espv%3D205%26ie%3DUTF-8" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;translate.google.com&#x2F;translate?hl=en&amp;sl=de&amp;tl=en&amp;u=ht...</a>
dbcooper将近 12 年前
Lets try an experiment with Amazon referrers.<p>(a) Take a &quot;randomly&quot; sourced blog post for a book review:<p><a href="http://reason.com/blog/2013/06/14/the-unwinding-is-george-packer-john-dos" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;reason.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2013&#x2F;06&#x2F;14&#x2F;the-unwinding-is-george-pa...</a><p>(b) Check links to amazon:<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0374102414/reasonmagazineA/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;exec&#x2F;obidos&#x2F;ASIN&#x2F;0374102414&#x2F;reasonmaga...</a><p>(c) Click through and check URL:<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0374102414/reasonmagazineA/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;exec&#x2F;obidos&#x2F;ASIN&#x2F;0374102414&#x2F;reasonmaga...</a><p>Looks OK. Anything I&#x27;m missing?
评论 #5946336 未加载
rmk2将近 12 年前
AdBlock Plus confirms most points via heise.de (updated half an hour ago): <a href="http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Schwere-Vorwuerfe-gegen-Werbeblocker-AdBlock-Plus-1897152.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.heise.de&#x2F;newsticker&#x2F;meldung&#x2F;Schwere-Vorwuerfe-geg...</a><p>&gt; In einer Stellungnahme bestätigen die Macher von AdBlock Plus die von Pallenberg aufgezeigten Zusammenhänge weitgehend. &quot;Ein Großteil der Informationen zu der Zusammenarbeit mit unseren Partnern ist korrekt recherchiert, einiges nicht&quot;, heißt es in einer Stellungnahme von Mitgründer Till Faida, den Pallenberg in seinem Artikel kritisiert hatte. &quot;Im Gegensatz zu Sascha Pallenberg sehen wir in der Vernetzung keinen Gewissenskonflikt.&quot;<p>The makers of AdBlock Plus largely confirm Pallenberg&#x27;s connections in a statement. &quot;The bulk of the information about the cooperation with our partners is investigated correctly, some isn&#x27;t&quot;, according to a statement by co-founder Till Faida, who Pallenberg had criticised in his article. &quot;Unlike Sascha, we do not see a moral conflict in this interconnectedness.&quot;<p>&gt;Das Unternehmen ist überzeugt, dass sich Werbeformen wie die &quot;Acceptable Ads&quot; langfristig durchsetzen wird. Das Whitelisting sei für kleine und mittelgroße Webseiten kostenlos. &quot;Dabei haben wir immer transparent geäußert, dass große Unternehmen unsere Initiative finanziell unterstützen.&quot; Eine Bevorzugung dieser Firmen gebe es jedoch nicht, die Kriterien seien für alle gleich. Auch die Kriterien der Entscheidungen durch die Community seien &quot;vollkommen transparent&quot;.<p>The company is convinced that advertisement forms like &quot;Acceptable Ads&quot; will prevail in the long run. Whitelisting is free of charge for small and medium-sized websites. &quot;We have always transparently communicated that big companies support our initiative financially.&quot; However, preferential treatment of these companies does not exist, the criteria are the same for everybody. The criteria for decisions by the community are also &quot;completely transparent.&quot; [1]<p>[1]: The whole paragraph is difficult to translate since it makes extensive use of indirect speech, which is marked by the German Konjunktiv, without a clear marker of a speaker. The whole paragraph is a mixture of direct quote and paraphrasing of the company&#x27;s own words and thus represents entirely the company&#x27;s view and assurance that everything is fair, transparent and openly communicated.<p>[edit] tense in the first paragraph [had criticised]
SifJar将近 12 年前
I&#x27;m struggling to fully understand the article due to the poor Google Translation. Anyone offer some concise clarification as to what ABP is <i>actually</i> doing? Is it &quot;just&quot; that they are changing Amazon referral links on websites to their own referral links so they get money instead, or is there more to it than that? Are they even actually doing that? (Or is it just that they aren&#x27;t <i>blocking</i> referral links made with software by one of ABP&#x27;s creators?)<p>EDIT: I came across this from a few months back: <a href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/web/adblock-plus-accused-of-shaking-down-websites/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.digitaltrends.com&#x2F;web&#x2F;adblock-plus-accused-of-sha...</a><p>Seems to be about some similar stuff
评论 #5945808 未加载
评论 #5945822 未加载
评论 #5946862 未加载
JoshTriplett将近 12 年前
What I find disturbing: the author of Adblock Plus famously went on a rant a long time ago about how people approached him to pay him to do various things with his popular extension, such as change default search engines. He refused, very publically, and bemoaned the likelihood that other extension authors might not.<p>And then the oxymoronic &quot;Acceptable Ads&quot; happened, and the painfully bad &quot;typo correction&quot; anti-feature (no, I really mean wikimedia, not wikipedia), and now this which ties into the &quot;typo correction&quot; bits. All of which are either on by default or pester the user to turn them on. And every one of these creates a new support issue for me with people I set up Adblock Plus for.
0x0将近 12 年前
Is this in any way related to the &quot;AdBlock&quot; extension (not &quot;...plus&quot;)? <a href="https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/adblock/gighmmpiobklfepjocnamgkkbiglidom" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;chrome.google.com&#x2F;webstore&#x2F;detail&#x2F;adblock&#x2F;gighmmpiob...</a>
评论 #5945775 未加载
Uchikoma将近 12 年前
From the article: Investors in Adblock Plus &#x2F; Owners of the company behind Adblock Plus also invest&#x2F;own ad-network companies, which they put on the white list while they keep out competitors. The article claims one can buy oneself onto the whitelist.
mparramon将近 12 年前
<a href="http://adblockplus.org/en/features" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;adblockplus.org&#x2F;en&#x2F;features</a> :<p>&quot;Adblock Plus will always block annoying ads. Still, many websites rely on advertising revenues so we want to encourage websites to use plain and unobtrusive advertising instead of flashy banners. That&#x27;s why the Adblock Plus community has established strict guidelines to identify acceptable ads, and Adblock Plus allows these out of the box. You can always disable this feature if you want to block all ads.&quot;<p>Could this be related?<p>Link to the guidelines: <a href="http://adblockplus.org/en/acceptable-ads#criteria" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;adblockplus.org&#x2F;en&#x2F;acceptable-ads#criteria</a><p>Edit: I just contacted Till Faida about this, will keep this post updated.
Zirro将近 12 年前
A blog post on the Adblock Plus-website from 44 days ago mentions a &quot;joint campaign&quot; by several German newspapers against ad blockers. I imagine this is part of it, although that&#x27;s doesn&#x27;t necessarily mean that they are wrong and&#x2F;or exaggerate their accusations.<p>See here: <a href="https://adblockplus.org/blog/our-thoughts-on-the-unity-of-german-newspapers-against-ad-blockers" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;adblockplus.org&#x2F;blog&#x2F;our-thoughts-on-the-unity-of-ge...</a>
评论 #5945829 未加载
hesselink将近 12 年前
I have Adblock Plus installed, but comparing an Amazon affiliate link in Firefox with Adblock Plus, with one in Chrome (no Adblock Plus) shows no difference.
评论 #5946118 未加载
Tobu将近 12 年前
I can&#x27;t find any reference to Amazon in the source code.<p>The source code is over there (GPL): <a href="https://hg.adblockplus.org/adblockplus/" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hg.adblockplus.org&#x2F;adblockplus&#x2F;</a><p>The article seems to say this is related to the typo feature, but <a href="https://hg.adblockplus.org/adblockplus/file/tip/defaults/typoRules.json" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hg.adblockplus.org&#x2F;adblockplus&#x2F;file&#x2F;tip&#x2F;defaults&#x2F;typ...</a> has never changed since the introduction of the feature in 2012-11.
评论 #5946194 未加载
sdfjkl将近 12 年前
So what&#x27;s a good alternative (Firefox)? I&#x27;m using GlimmerBlocker, but due to being a proxy, it can&#x27;t filter HTTPS pages.<p>Adblock Edge looks like a decrapified fork of Adblock Plus.
评论 #5945800 未加载
评论 #5945910 未加载
评论 #5946095 未加载
评论 #5945847 未加载
评论 #5945673 未加载
评论 #5945700 未加载
sciurus将近 12 年前
These are the ads Adblock Plus allows: <a href="https://easylist-downloads.adblockplus.org/exceptionrules.txt" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;easylist-downloads.adblockplus.org&#x2F;exceptionrules.tx...</a>
hartator将近 12 年前
Changing Amazon referencial links... Seriously? and this guy is asking for donation putting forward his wife and his life.
评论 #5945705 未加载
Sujan将近 12 年前
FYI: The article is separated on 2 pages:<p><a href="http://www.mobilegeeks.de/adblock-plus-undercover-einblicke-in-ein-mafioeses-werbenetzwerk/2/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mobilegeeks.de&#x2F;adblock-plus-undercover-einblicke-...</a> <a href="http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.mobilegeeks.de%2Fadblock-plus-undercover-einblicke-in-ein-mafioeses-werbenetzwerk%2F2%2F&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:de:official&amp;client=firefox-a" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;webcache.googleusercontent.com&#x2F;search?q=cache%3Ahttp%...</a><p>The allegation concerning rewriting links is on this second page, for example.
bliker将近 12 年前
if you have a minute you can go there and report abuse<p><a href="https://chrome.google.com/webstore/report/cfhdojbkjhnklbpkdaibdccddilifddb" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;chrome.google.com&#x2F;webstore&#x2F;report&#x2F;cfhdojbkjhnklbpkda...</a><p>and<p><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/adblock-plus/#id=1865" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;addons.mozilla.org&#x2F;en-US&#x2F;firefox&#x2F;addon&#x2F;adblock-plus&#x2F;...</a>
评论 #5946040 未加载
fhd2将近 12 年前
(Edit: The headline used to be &quot;Adblock Plus is changing Amazon refs&quot;, but it has been fixed. I commented on the new one below [6].)<p>I&#x27;m a developer at Eyeo, working on Adblock Plus. Adblock Plus is not changing Amazon links. TFA is ripe with FUD, but it doesn&#x27;t even go this far.<p>Maybe this was a major misunderstanding of the typo correction feature [1], which is opt-in, only implemented in Firefox and merely corrects typos in URLs, always telling what it corrected. I was never really sure how it fits into ABP, but I fail to see how this could be considered shady.<p>Other than that, the only thing Adblock Plus does is block content. Which content that is depends on the filter lists you use. There are defaults, but you&#x27;re free to use any you like, or create your own. It&#x27;s usually ads, but ABP is also pretty good at blocking any kind of tracking [2].<p>Back to TFA. The main allegations are:<p>1. The CEO and the angel investor at Eyeo have ties to the ad industry<p>2. Adblock Plus is letting ads through if sites pay for it<p>3. Adblock Plus is burning money<p>One at a time:<p>1. This is true. Eyeo was founded to find a middle ground between users blocking ads and sites monetising from ads. The idea is that there are decent ads that most people wouldn&#x27;t want to block, in the sea of horrible ads - &quot;acceptable ads&quot; [3]. &quot;The ad industry&quot; is not a single evil entity that wants to blind us all, some people in it actually want to make ads better. Hence Wladimir joined forces with them.<p>2. Every site can have their ads whitelisted, and ads that violate the criteria [4] will not be whitelisted. Some sites are supporting us financially, others don&#x27;t. I think the main controversy is that this feature is opt-out rather than opt-in.<p>3. I disagree. More than half of the employees on the payroll are working remotely, deliberately. We wouldn&#x27;t even all fit into the office, which is nice, but cheap (it&#x27;s a building that&#x27;s going to be demolished in 1-2 years). We&#x27;re barely profitable, nobody&#x27;s getting rich. We manage the infrastructure that delivers the filter lists - which are used by literally every other ad blocker out there, for free, and that&#x27;s fine. Everything we create is open source [5], everything can be forked, and that&#x27;s fine.<p>[1] <a href="http://adblockplus.org/blog/typo-correction-feature-in-adblock-plus" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;adblockplus.org&#x2F;blog&#x2F;typo-correction-feature-in-adblo...</a><p>[2] <a href="http://adblockplus.org/en/features#tracking" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;adblockplus.org&#x2F;en&#x2F;features#tracking</a><p>[3] <a href="http://adblockplus.org/en/acceptable-ads" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;adblockplus.org&#x2F;en&#x2F;acceptable-ads</a><p>[4] <a href="http://adblockplus.org/en/acceptable-ads#criteria" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;adblockplus.org&#x2F;en&#x2F;acceptable-ads#criteria</a><p>[5] <a href="https://hg.adblockplus.org/" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hg.adblockplus.org&#x2F;</a><p>[6] <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5947553" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=5947553</a>
评论 #5947553 未加载
评论 #5947430 未加载
Sujan将近 12 年前
The allegations concerning changing referal links are based on a source file of the extension. Did anybody check that? Any real proof or is this just a leftover?
评论 #5946315 未加载
Kerrick将近 12 年前
This must be why Amazon Associates changed their Terms of Service starting July 1. <a href="https://affiliate-program.amazon.com/gp/associates/help/operating/compare" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;affiliate-program.amazon.com&#x2F;gp&#x2F;associates&#x2F;help&#x2F;oper...</a><p>&gt; <i>“7. Except as agreed between you and us in a separate written agreement referencing this Participation Requirement, you will not use any Content or Special Link, or otherwise link to the Amazon Site, on or in connection with:</i><p>&gt; <i>a. any client-side software application (e.g., a browser plug-in, helper object, toolbar, extension, or component or any other application executable or installable by an end user) on any device, including computers, mobile phones, tablets, or other handheld devices;</i><p>&gt; [...]
tommis将近 12 年前
There is NO proof or evidence of tampering with amazon refs.<p>Still a lot of people are reporting the extension or looking for alternatives in this thread.<p>Seriously: Not everything you read on the web is true. This smells like a smear campaign, nothing more - until real evidence or proof is shown of the claims.
评论 #5946311 未加载
Sujan将近 12 年前
Objection here from Till Faida (CEO) here: <a href="http://t3n.de/news/adblock-plus-geschaftsfuhrer-476502/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;t3n.de&#x2F;news&#x2F;adblock-plus-geschaftsfuhrer-476502&#x2F;</a> (German)
flashfabrixx将近 12 年前
The link refers to a given interview (<a href="http://j.mp/138mDHs" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;j.mp&#x2F;138mDHs</a>) with Till Filda (Owner of Ad Block Plus) who gives the information that user can opt-out of the build in &quot;Acceptable Ads program&quot;.<p>In his words the reason for an acceptable ads program seems to be showing acceptable ads (non flashing, blinking, annoying, ...) to the user which seems legit.<p>Can&#x27;t understand the &#x27;Mafia&#x27; term in this. It&#x27;s a free product this is their business model. You as a user choose if you accept (or opt-out) this or leave the product behind.
antoviaque将近 12 年前
For Firefox users, there is Adblock Lite, a fork created after the &quot;Acceptable ads&quot; story on AdBlock Plus a few months ago:<p><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/adblock_lite/" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;addons.mozilla.org&#x2F;en-US&#x2F;firefox&#x2F;addon&#x2F;adblock_lite&#x2F;</a><p>&quot;Adblocklite is a fork of the Adblock Plus version 1.3.10 (classic UI) extension for blocking advertisements on the web. This fork will provide the same features as Adblock Plus 2.X and higher while keeping the old UI but without &quot;acceptable ads&quot; feature.&quot;
beedogs将近 12 年前
Site also seems to be suffering a mafia-like DDoS attack.
NIL8将近 12 年前
This seems a lot like cookie-stuffing.<p>AdBlock and AdBlockPlus are free to run their company any way they want (within reason). However, this is a serious breach of trust. They should inform me of any change or re-direct they perform - before they do it.
cletus将近 12 年前
The essence of this is you need to decide the answer to two questions:<p>1. What are your personal ethics?<p>2. Who do you trust?<p>To put (1) in context, the content on the Internet is largely provided free but is ad-supported. When it comes to display advertising, it&#x27;s sold almost entirely on a CPM basis (it may be resold on an eCPC or eCPA basis). It is at best only partially sold on an intent basis (meaning it&#x27;s enticing you to click on the ad or otherwise take some kind of action).<p>The relevance is that the most common &quot;defence&quot; of ad-blocking is &quot;I never click on ads anyway&quot;. While that <i>might</i> be true (let&#x27;s just say that the people who claim to have never clicked on an ad is a proper superset of the people who have never clicked on an ad) it&#x27;s also irrelevant since that may not be the intent and the publisher is getting paid to display the ad, not for you to click on it (unlike, say, search advertising, which is intent based).<p>So the ethical part here is you need to decide if you&#x27;re OK with denying publishers income yet still consuming their content. If you are against ads for whatever reason and don&#x27;t consume the content, that&#x27;s a position I can respect, otherwise it just strikes me as rationalized freeloading but YMMV.<p>As for (2), the big players like Google who dominate display advertising are regulated and deeply concerned (believe it or not) about privacy and the user experience. That&#x27;s why you can opt out of personalized ads [1], for example. I may be biased [2] but I trust Google far more than I trust some fly-by-night operation. Again, YMMV.<p>Recently there was a story about Ghostery reselling user data to advertisers [3]. How much can you <i>really</i> trust these basically unaccountable groups (in comparison)?<p>I should point out that there are two issues here that intertwine:<p>1. Ad-blocking;<p>2. Privacy.<p>My personal code of ethics is I don&#x27;t block ads because honestly I mentally block them out anyway. Going to the Westin site then seeing ads for the Westin everywhere doesn&#x27;t particularly bother me.<p>If a site has particularly egregioius ads (I include popups, most interstitials and any ads you need to dismiss in this category) then all bets are off. Block away. Banner ads however? Sure, why not?<p>But where I draw the line is with uselessly giving away your privacy in a way that doesn&#x27;t benefit publishers at all. I include all the various &quot;Like&quot; and &quot;Share&quot; buttons here. All of these track for no benefit to the publisher (other than the hope that you might use one).<p>Those I&#x27;ll happily block. Likewise if you&#x27;re Quora and you blur answers because I&#x27;m not logged in with Facebook, well you&#x27;ll get technically circumvented as well and I may just block any ads you have just because you&#x27;re being offensive.<p>Anyway, just consider that ad-blockers have access to a wide range of your data as well and ask yourself what they are doing or might do with that data. Is it really worth denying publishers income to not see an ad for shoes? Really?<p>[1]: <a href="http://www.google.com/ads/preferences" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;ads&#x2F;preferences</a><p>[2]: Disclaimer: I am a Google engineer working in display advertising<p>[3]: <a href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2013/06/ad-blocking-extension-ghostery-actually-sells-data-to-advertisers/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.lifehacker.com.au&#x2F;2013&#x2F;06&#x2F;ad-blocking-extension-g...</a>
评论 #5946513 未加载
评论 #5946363 未加载
评论 #5946403 未加载
评论 #5946500 未加载
评论 #5946492 未加载
评论 #5946724 未加载
评论 #5946542 未加载
评论 #5948153 未加载
评论 #5946431 未加载
评论 #5947385 未加载
dekz将近 12 年前
<a href="https://adblockplus.org/blog/typo-correction-feature-in-adblock-plus" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;adblockplus.org&#x2F;blog&#x2F;typo-correction-feature-in-adbl...</a><p>&gt;Whenever typo correction brings you to the site of a large online shop an affiliate ID will be added to the address. This makes sure that if you buy something there we get a small amount of money from the shop.<p>Mentioned on their website.
radiospiel将近 12 年前
The original, german text does not state that ABP actually rewrites amazon affiliate links. It mentions &quot;Amazon&quot; once, in a sentence which could be translated at &quot;..how to justify drying up financial base (which are amazon links) for thousands of small blogs..&quot;<p>(That doesn&#x27;t mean ABP does not change amazon referral links, though)
评论 #5945960 未加载
评论 #5945929 未加载
MattDL将近 12 年前
Isn&#x27;t it possible to just check the source code of FireFox addons?<p>Would be good if somebody could confirm if that is the case.
评论 #5945977 未加载
philtar将近 12 年前
Can anyone actually confirm this?
评论 #5946321 未加载
nilved将近 12 年前
Who&#x27;s been using Adblock Plus after they whitelisted sites behind your back? It jumped the shark. Move on to one of the dozens of lightweight, superior forks.
评论 #5947429 未加载
sp332将近 12 年前
When I click the page, it just loads google translate recursively. <a href="http://imgur.com/JJJ231i" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;imgur.com&#x2F;JJJ231i</a>
oomkiller将近 12 年前
On a related note, has anyone considered the fallout of a popular extensions like Adblock&#x2F;Adblock Chrome etc being compromised?
izietto将近 12 年前
NoSCript <a href="http://noscript.net/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;noscript.net&#x2F;</a> is way better
评论 #5947496 未加载