TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Is there room for a Knuth-like work nowadays?

5 点作者 rosche将近 12 年前
I do research in and teach computer science at all levels (BSc, MSc, PhD). My dream has always been working in academia, and to an extent, I&#x27;ve realized that dream, obviously. My absolute scientific north star has been Knuth&#x27;s work, not only TAOCP, but his life&#x27;s work, including literate programming. I&#x27;ve always dreamed of writing a magnus opus like that in my field.<p>But I can see that such comprehensive works, in the age of the internet, are impossible to write with an acceptable degree of generality: everything is in Wikipedia.<p>My question is: although I&#x27;m <i>far</i> from being Don Knuth, Do you think there is room for a book on any topic with the depth and breadth similar to Knuth&#x27;s in this age?

2 条评论

tjr将近 12 年前
Knuth himself wrote of his current work on Volume 4B that &quot;There&#x27;s stuff in here that isn&#x27;t in Wikipedia yet!&quot; :-)<p>So it&#x27;s not true that everything is in Wikipedia, but even more importantly, even if the raw facts are in Wikipedia, that doesn&#x27;t mean it&#x27;s expressed in the best possible way.<p>I greatly enjoy reading Knuth&#x27;s work; his writing style is delightful. Reading Wikipedia is often dry and lifeless.
评论 #5967338 未加载
brudgers将近 12 年前
I suspect Knuth writes because he has something he feels compelled to say, not because of market analysis.<p>There is always shelf space for well written books which express an author&#x27;s passion. In fact since there&#x27;s shelf space for all those books about Gettysburg, good writing is probably negotiable.