TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Hyperboria(secure internet alternative) not so secure or even safe?

4 点作者 freechoice22将近 12 年前
Lately Hyperboria which is based on cjdns has been mentioned on Hacker news headlines. It got me starting to research about meshnets and since Hyperboria seems to be getting hyped up as the next secure internet it got me thinking if that is really true or if there are better alternatives. Apparently cjdns uses labels in the messages sent through routers to be be tracked back and forth, which to my understanding is not so secure or anonymous. Even if the message is encrypted along the way. I can see how the message with encryption could be breached at nodes and then backtracked to original source, or who knows how. But the fact is the chatlog I found does have some valid points as regard to cjdns being faulty advertised as secured anonymous decentralized network. Apparently I2P network is more true to that and which uses a direct tunnel between two parties instead of using routes and labels traveling a long road. A lot could happen on that road...

1 comment

p4bl0将近 12 年前
This is not very interesing, it's just someone who mixed up the concept of meshnet and darknet and tried to compare I2P with CJDNS, which makes no sense.