TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Hosting performance / Hosting convenience

18 点作者 franklaemmer将近 12 年前

5 条评论

mashmac2将近 12 年前
Everyone&#x27;s Kepner-Tregoe Decision Analysis weights requirements differently, and convenience is a powerful requirement for many people. Performance is for others.<p>Say what you will about how awful shared hosting is, but the one-click installer of Wordpress et al has proven that a market exists where people are happy to pay to host things in the most convenient manner possible. Of course, in a more technical community, performance is part of a factor.
incision将近 12 年前
In my experience, pride plays heavily into the devaluing of convenience. For every abstraction and or simplification there are people who put it somewhere on a scale from wasteful to cheating.<p>You don&#x27;t even have to dig very far into these discussions to find the guys who don&#x27;t abide hosting at all. They can&#x27;t fathom why everyone doesn&#x27;t build their own bespoke hardware and string together their own orchestration.
评论 #6019918 未加载
nasalgoat将近 12 年前
This post sounds like an excuse for poor performance in favour of convenience.<p>The better question is, why can&#x27;t you have both?
workhere-io将近 12 年前
The problem with AWS is that it&#x27;s neither fast <i>nor</i> particularly convenient or user-friendly.
评论 #6019899 未加载
评论 #6019813 未加载
stephenr将近 12 年前
So it&#x27;s hosted on AWS, which you admit rules out performance. It&#x27;s shared, and has heavy arbitrary limits on resource usage, so that rules out convenience.