TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

DARPA and Boston Dynamics unveil a new humanoid robot

123 点作者 Dj_Anthony2013将近 12 年前

17 条评论

uncoder0将近 12 年前
I&#x27;m getting tired of extremetech blogspam and sensationalism. This source video was posted yesterday by me and didn&#x27;t really make it anywhere. It seems I should get a voting ring and embellish my titles a bit more.<p>If anyone wants to read up on the DRC the two latest press releases are here: <a href="http://www.darpa.mil/NewsEvents/Releases/2013/07/11.aspx" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.darpa.mil&#x2F;NewsEvents&#x2F;Releases&#x2F;2013&#x2F;07&#x2F;11.aspx</a> <a href="http://www.darpa.mil/NewsEvents/Releases/2013/06/27.aspx" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.darpa.mil&#x2F;NewsEvents&#x2F;Releases&#x2F;2013&#x2F;06&#x2F;27.aspx</a>.
评论 #6033200 未加载
评论 #6033092 未加载
评论 #6036044 未加载
评论 #6034165 未加载
lmg643将近 12 年前
Terminator has always been one of my favorite movies, and reality has an uncanny way of getting us closer and closer to the fantasy. We justify this new technology in the same way - &quot;it&#x27;s for our protection&quot;!<p>Dictators run into trouble when the armies decide they won&#x27;t attack a local population because, hey, it&#x27;s their families and friends we&#x27;re talking about. Robots eliminate that pesky detail. Imagine how a secession crisis, based on, say, widespread spying by the government on its own citizens, might be dealt with today versus fifty years from now.<p>-----<p>If you were a resident of Afghanistan, the concept of a war against the robots is already a reality. From that perspective, is a fairly minor detail that the robots are currently piloted by people and not computers. And I expect the AI would get effective pretty quickly - I&#x27;m sure they will develop some effective way to identify a potential combatant based on either holding a weapon or some body language&#x2F;temperature cues.<p>This technology might not be field ready right now, but it won&#x27;t be long. It&#x27;s reasonable to expect that with some work, it would far exceed human capacity upon a few key dimensions - running speed, targeting ability, carrying armor&#x2F;defensibility. Just like no human being can outrun even the crappiest car over any reasonable distance.
评论 #6035587 未加载
评论 #6033835 未加载
评论 #6033715 未加载
sbarre将近 12 年前
The stuff that Boston Dynamics is doing with DARPA funding feels like a current-generation parallel to how DARPA funded the early efforts at building the Internet.<p>I suspect we will look back on these guys as some of the early pioneers of the yet-to-come ubiquitous robotics era.
评论 #6033604 未加载
hedonist将近 12 年前
God this is awful. Just a matter of time before these beasts are used to serve search warrants, deal with &quot;difficult&quot; protests, etc.
评论 #6033877 未加载
评论 #6033926 未加载
doctoboggan将近 12 年前
When the US uses robots like this in war (and it will) we will enjoy a significant reduction in casualties and probably an increase in battle victories. This will probably embolden future US leaders, similar to when the US had the only nuclear weapons.<p>During the cold war we learned the hard way that time lowers costs of technology, and soon everyone had nuclear weapons.<p>I am sure the same will happen with robotic warriors and I fear the day when a terrorist can pilot a drone over my home and kill me with the same prejudice we use when piloting drones in the middle east today.<p>My only hope is that some politicians also understand this and move to create international robotic warrior regulations and treaties. I am skeptical of this happening however. It is always more fun to lord your power over your enemies today than to have some foresight.
评论 #6035905 未加载
dicroce将近 12 年前
Used to think these things were cool but now that I can&#x27;t trust my government anymore... I find them deeply disturbing.
评论 #6035032 未加载
Shivetya将近 12 年前
What is the point of having it be bipedal?<p>Would not the dog&#x2F;four legged system work out better? You could still have it manipulate items with forelegs if you wanted but keep the inherit stability
评论 #6033866 未加载
评论 #6034147 未加载
评论 #6033784 未加载
评论 #6033988 未加载
评论 #6035001 未加载
评论 #6036666 未加载
jotm将近 12 年前
Disaster recovery, assistance and space applications (asteroid mining?) are the only real applications of these robots.<p>This is not going to be useful in the military. The only advantage it may have over humans is increased accuracy, and even then, a mobile gun platform on wheels will do a much better job.<p>This robot is less mobile, less reliable, less endurable, much less smart and much less flexible than any average soldier. The only applications I can think of are extreme weather conditions (i.e. Antarctica and the Sahara desert), and even then it would probably fail fast.<p>I don&#x27;t think it&#x27;s complete garbage, it&#x27;s just that I don&#x27;t see it being close to useful in real military applications this century.
评论 #6033838 未加载
评论 #6033356 未加载
评论 #6035557 未加载
bitwize将近 12 年前
Now all we have to do is scale it up and we&#x27;ll be ready for when the kaiju attack.
评论 #6033868 未加载
评论 #6033231 未加载
评论 #6037071 未加载
sanoli将近 12 年前
I&#x27;d like to know about its energy consumption, and how long would it operate with today&#x27;s best battery technologies. That seems to me to be one of the bigger hurdles for turning this into something operational, but I might be wrong. Still, it&#x27;s 330 lbs to move on two legs (future versions of course will be lighter, but, being military, it probably can&#x27;t be all lightweight stuff). Anyone here with more knowledge about this care to give their opinion?
kevincennis将近 12 年前
Slightly off-topic, but the video of this thing&#x27;s predecessor, BigDog, is simultaneously fascinating and hilarious: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&amp;v=2jvLalY6ubc" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?feature=player_embedded&amp;v=2jvL...</a>
mamcx将近 12 年前
The current geek want it, the future geek with the robotic gun in his head don&#x27;t.
评论 #6034074 未加载
hooo将近 12 年前
What&#x27;s the advantage of making the robot humanoid?
评论 #6034431 未加载
评论 #6034121 未加载
racecar789将近 12 年前
Looks like it has the Matrix of Leadership in its chest, just like Optimus Prime.
ianstallings将近 12 年前
Damn, no robot balls to kick. There goes my plan.<p>I think this is incredible actually. It&#x27;s worth noting they tend to try not to show power tether feeding the thing. But once they get it all nailed it&#x27;s gonna be amazing. Truly <i>awesome</i>.
colmvp将近 12 年前
Why does it have two lenses on its head instead of just one?
评论 #6035456 未加载
taylodl将近 12 年前
We really need to ratify and institute Isaac Asimov&#x27;s 3 Laws of Robotics (<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Laws_of_Robotics" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Three_Laws_of_Robotics</a>) otherwise I&#x27;m afraid our future selves will regret it.
评论 #6040195 未加载
评论 #6037075 未加载