TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Yahoo wins motion to declassify court documents in PRISM case

477 点作者 falk将近 12 年前

15 条评论

pvnick将近 12 年前
I'm switching back to Firefox and exploring Yahoo equivalents to google products? Hell must be getting pretty cold right about now.
评论 #6050193 未加载
评论 #6049718 未加载
评论 #6049708 未加载
评论 #6050226 未加载
评论 #6050425 未加载
评论 #6053376 未加载
tomelders将近 12 年前
It&#x27;s good, but it&#x27;s not US Constitution good. None of the companies involved should obey the law in this matter, and they should adhere to their moral responsibilities and reveal everything they know.<p>Plus, I doubt locking up the CEO&#x27;s of the worlds largest tech companies would work out well for any government.
评论 #6052101 未加载
评论 #6051302 未加载
评论 #6051498 未加载
rfctr将近 12 年前
&gt; &quot;The Government shall conduct a declassification review of this Court&#x27;s Memorandum Opinion of [Yahoo&#x27;s case] and the legal briefs submitted by the parties to this Court,&quot; the ruling read.<p>What I don&#x27;t get here: it was told many times that FISA court only hears one side, namely government. Here though Yahoo seems to be named a party in the Court. Has rules change? o_O
评论 #6050157 未加载
locusm将近 12 年前
At least they stopped getting Chinese dissidents locked up <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Yahoo" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Criticism_of_Yahoo</a>!
评论 #6049699 未加载
评论 #6049700 未加载
eastdakota将近 12 年前
Working link: <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57593871-93/yahoo-wins-motion-to-declassify-court-documents-in-prism-case/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.cnet.com&#x2F;8301-1023_3-57593871-93&#x2F;yahoo-wins-moti...</a>
count将近 12 年前
Hmm, it doesn&#x27;t say they get to declassify, only that the classification must be reviewed, and then the document published with any properly classified information redacted.<p>Expect a letter of all black lines.
Groxx将近 12 年前
Question:<p>&gt;<i>Yahoo has previously denied the allegations regarding participation in the program, calling them &quot;categorically false.&quot;</i><p>That&#x27;s what they say, but doesn&#x27;t this just show that while they fought it, they <i>did</i> participate because they lost the fight?[1]<p>I&#x27;m not aiming to say &quot;liar, liar, pants on fire&quot; since they were probably required to say that (if my reading is accurate). I&#x27;m just wondering if they <i>were</i> required to say that, as this is <i>nearly</i> evidence of it, which would cast even more doubt on the other companies&#x27; denials.<p>[1] <a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/07/yahoo-fight-for-users-earns-company-special-recognition" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eff.org&#x2F;deeplinks&#x2F;2013&#x2F;07&#x2F;yahoo-fight-for-users-...</a> (thanks, cmwelsh!) in particular this quote:<p>&gt;<i>Ultimately, the Court of Review ruled against Yahoo, upholding the constitutionality of the Protect America Act and ordering Yahoo to turn over the user data the government requested.</i><p>Though they can&#x27;t say what was turned over.
评论 #6051025 未加载
motters将近 12 年前
The leaked slide says that Yahoo was assimilated into PRISM on 3&#x2F;12&#x2F;2008. I assume that must be some time after the secret court decision.
评论 #6050651 未加载
brymaster将近 12 年前
Wow. First they lie and deny, now this.<p>What does this mean for Google and the others participating in the program? I&#x27;d love to read some explanations from Page, Yonatan Zunger, Matt Cutts and friends. These guys were swearing up and down that Google had no involvement.
评论 #6053711 未加载
mindslight将近 12 年前
So wait, if PRISM is merely the process by which NSA et al request data on individual suspects which are then reviewed and fulfilled with human involvement (as the denials by Google etc purport)... why did Yahoo see fit to challenge their involvement?
评论 #6050260 未加载
评论 #6050190 未加载
perlpimp将近 12 年前
.. &quot;redacts any properly classified information&quot; ..<p>Who gets to decide what is property classified information? They can redact the document in such a way that it carry only vacuous material and thus passively aggressively refuse even if they are compelled.
Mordor将近 12 年前
This proves nothing, since PRISM likely isn&#x27;t the only program run by the NSA.
yaix将近 12 年前
I&#x27;d love to switch to ymail, if it didn&#x27;t suck so bad. I just read, that Y! will be &#x2F;reassigning&#x2F; email adresses that have not been used (no login) for a year.
michaelxia将近 12 年前
yay!<p>yahoo, the internet giant whose products gather data from evuhreybaddy, is on our side!<p>now all our problems are solved and we can sleep at night<p>oh wait...
评论 #6049646 未加载
_pmf_将近 12 年前
So brave.