TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Flynn - Open Source PaaS powered by Docker

339 点作者 danielsiders将近 12 年前

28 条评论

soapdog将近 12 年前
I wanted to contribute but I am a single freelance developer, I don't have the amount of money shown on the sponsorship options. I would be great to have a USD 50 option there.
评论 #6059187 未加载
评论 #6059185 未加载
评论 #6059139 未加载
评论 #6071582 未加载
jcastro将近 12 年前
This is great guys, good to see more people bringing PaaS-like workflow without the baggage. We&#x27;ve been working in this space with Juju (<a href="http://juju.ubuntu.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;juju.ubuntu.com</a>) but we&#x27;re using standard LXC for containers.<p>Using LXC allows us to support applications that run on multiple processes, and since Juju is also written in Go, It seems like it might be possible for us to work together in some interesting ways.<p>We already have charms for Rack, node.js, Django, etc. already working and we can replicate the example in the video, just on raw LXC, EC2, and OpenStack. And we’ve put a lot of time and energy into managing the relationships between services, which is the big complicated part of a PaaS So, there seems to be pretty good overlap.<p>Have you looked at Juju? Perhaps there are places where you can leverage the heavy lifting that the juju team has already done in creating a “bring your own” kind of PaaS.
评论 #6059574 未加载
评论 #6059516 未加载
评论 #6062142 未加载
opdemand将近 12 年前
We at OpDemand wish the Flynn crew the best of luck. I expect more Docker-powered PaaS&#x27;s to sprout up, so I&#x27;m glad Solomon and the dotCloud crew are focused so heavily on interoperability.<p>OpDemand will be releasing a very similar open-source project called Deis in the next few weeks. It&#x27;s an open-source PaaS powered by Docker &amp; Chef, with a Heroku-inspired workflow.<p>We&#x27;re busy ironing out a few final issues, putting together documentation, quick-start guides, tutorials, etc.. but we are very close to launching our public 0.1.0, which will allow you to deploy your own private PaaS providing you complete control over hosting, backends, proxies and more.
评论 #6060002 未加载
评论 #6060329 未加载
jahewson将近 12 年前
My main problem with Docker is that container IP addresses and MACs are changed after every container reboot. This means I can&#x27;t have a database in one container and a web app in another because I have no way for the web app to discover the address of the database server.<p>Seems like this would be an issue for the host-only (private) network?
评论 #6058913 未加载
评论 #6060030 未加载
评论 #6060466 未加载
评论 #6059092 未加载
评论 #6059626 未加载
chatmasta将近 12 年前
And this is why you shouldn&#x27;t open source the core part of your business (looking at you DotCloud). Sure, Docker is good for the community. But it&#x27;s also a key competitive advantage for DotCloud. By giving away that advantage, they create opportunities for viable competitors.
评论 #6058946 未加载
评论 #6058900 未加载
评论 #6058858 未加载
druiid将近 12 年前
Very cool! Been looking for something like this since Docker was announced. Basically Cloud Foundry is far too complex for what I&#x2F;we need but this would fit the bill nicely.<p>One question though, what is going to be &#x27;the cluster&#x27; (The site says it distributes work across &#x27;the cluster&#x27;)? Basically, will it be capable of interfacing with cloud API&#x27;s or will it just be you manually setting up a group of instances to host the machines to run Docker on top of?
评论 #6058873 未加载
sciurus将近 12 年前
&quot;Unlike existing open source PaaS products, Flynn focuses on providing a set of modular components that can be replaced and reused.&quot;<p>I wonder if there is anyone here who works on CloudFoundry or OpenShift and could comment on this, or comment on the proposed capabilities of Flynn (<a href="https://github.com/flynn/flynn-spec" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;flynn&#x2F;flynn-spec</a>) compared to the capabilities of their systems.
评论 #6059227 未加载
评论 #6061890 未加载
avgp将近 12 年前
What are the advantages&#x2F;disadvantages compared to Dokku (<a href="http://progrium.com/blog/2013/06/19/dokku-the-smallest-paas-implementation-youve-ever-seen/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;progrium.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2013&#x2F;06&#x2F;19&#x2F;dokku-the-smallest-paas-...</a>)? It is also based on Docker, super easy to set up on your own server and: Available today.
评论 #6059147 未加载
评论 #6059135 未加载
knodi将近 12 年前
Heroku I&#x27;m looking at you, lower your prices.
评论 #6059216 未加载
评论 #6059119 未加载
评论 #6059307 未加载
cabalamat将近 12 年前
Is there an explain-like-I&#x27;m-5 explanation of what this is and why it is useful? Because I&#x27;ve only a very vague idea of what it&#x27;s about.
评论 #6061223 未加载
vhodges将近 12 年前
Re: 1500 Minimum, definitely understand the model you&#x27;re going for, but some of us ARE companies, just really small.<p>I&#x27;d be happy to contribute at a lower level (at least $100, possibly up to $500) as I do see the value in this.<p>Dokku is more than sufficient for my needs at the moment, but see Flynn as a natural extension to that.
评论 #6061074 未加载
mwcampbell将近 12 年前
I like the fact that Flynn will be written primarily in Go. That should mean very little overhead for this PaaS.<p>I wonder if using Heroku buildpacks is a good idea, though. Something that can more fully take advantage of Docker layers, and in some cases APT packages for language runtimes, would be better IMO.
评论 #6059172 未加载
评论 #6059226 未加载
simonpantzare将近 12 年前
I got interested in building something like this when I saw Docker issue 410[1]. If my understanding is correct Mesos uses Zookeeper to keep a Mesos master available. Zab, Zookeeper&#x27;s distributed consensus algorithm, is similar to Raft which has a popular Go implementation[2] written by Ben Johnson. Perhaps Flynn agents can use this implementation.<p>1. <a href="https://github.com/dotcloud/docker/issues/410" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;dotcloud&#x2F;docker&#x2F;issues&#x2F;410</a><p>2. <a href="https://github.com/benbjohnson/go-raft" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;benbjohnson&#x2F;go-raft</a>
oellegaard将近 12 年前
I was trying to built something similar, already had a proof of concept ready built on top of components from Dokku. I can&#x27;t wait to follow this project - I might even pull myself together and learn go!
评论 #6059065 未加载
jedahan将近 12 年前
I&#x27;d love to see a comparison between this and [deliver](<a href="https://github.com/gerhard/deliver" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;gerhard&#x2F;deliver</a>)
chrisfarms将近 12 年前
I&#x27;d love to know more about how the cluster will organized. Is there going to be some kind of master controller node, or will it be distributed and self organizing somehow?<p>It almost feels as tho Flynn (or maybe something build on top of Flynn) could&#x2F;should be a whole minimal linux distribution (SmartOS-ish) that could just boot up into RAM, be told to read a cluster config from somewhere and then start working for the cluster accepting Docker services.
评论 #6060024 未加载
julien421将近 12 年前
Dokku on Steroids! gg guys!
silasb将近 12 年前
Just read the FAQ and saw that Flynn is “Super Dokku”<p>Awesome job.
评论 #6058909 未加载
slajax将近 12 年前
So it&#x27;s a git post-receive hook that parses a Procfile and starts your app?
评论 #6059073 未加载
polvi将近 12 年前
I&#x27;m curious what type of deployment APIs people want. It is the docker rest API + git push for your own code? Should we be using heroku APIs? Are we going to invent something new like OpenStack did?
评论 #6059275 未加载
评论 #6059232 未加载
jpadilla_将近 12 年前
Seems like there&#x27;s a CSS issue with the sponsor modal <a href="http://d.pr/i/Pgko" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;d.pr&#x2F;i&#x2F;Pgko</a>
评论 #6058894 未加载
echohack将近 12 年前
Does anyone know anything like this (a self hosted PaaS) for .NET?<p>I&#x27;d love to use docker or something similar for .NET applications.
评论 #6060131 未加载
jonny_eh将近 12 年前
This looks amazing! I wish I could contribute $20 or so, but looks like $1500 is the minimum?
评论 #6059057 未加载
danielsiders将近 12 年前
Just added a mailing list form at the bottom of the page for anyone who&#x27;s interested.
alpb将近 12 年前
Can&#x27;t I contribute with my $10? I&#x27;ll use it personally.
danielsiders将近 12 年前
Join the discussion in #flynn on freenode
amccloud将近 12 年前
So it&#x27;s not open source yet?
评论 #6058798 未加载
评论 #6058918 未加载
评论 #6058836 未加载
baq将近 12 年前
$ wtf is paas
评论 #6060511 未加载