Top 10 Tech Failures of the Decade. YouTube...Really?

Gateway (the Acer of American PC vendors.)<p>HD DVD (acronym overload, no differentiation from Blu-Ray.)<p>Vonage (like Skype, but with an AT&#38;T syntax)<p>Youtube (low definition format, low comment intelligence, low interest cellphone videos.)<p>Sirius XM (financiers of Howard Stern lost to the Chinese $5 FM transmitter makers.)<p>Microsoft Zune (the portable version of Windows Media Player but only browner.)<p>Palm (HTML5 based "OS" might help you now, but I will never forgive you for that Pilot API.)<p>Iridium (never heard of them before Miami Vice, the movie, and never since. Lost to regional sat services)<p>Segway (a wheel-chair for the able-bodied; early adopters considerably dorkier than rest of population. Way too much of a "tourism office" gimmick toy than anything nowadays.)

Yet another rehashing of the (inaccurate) Credit Suisse story.

the real story here, is that when you hit print, it doesn't show the entire article.

If the article is saying something stupid, why submit it here? Better to ignore it than post it and get no feedback beyond us calling Time stupid. That's not a valuable use of time.

On a monetary basis, Yes.

When are we going to stop defining "success" by whether something makes lots of money?