TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Science of Winning Poker

88 点作者 bonchibuji将近 12 年前

5 条评论

tedsanders将近 12 年前
&gt;A few years ago, a young pro named Phil Galfond published a crucial refinement to Mr. Sklansky&#x27;s point. He showed that the right way to analyze a poker decision is to consider your opponent&#x27;s &quot;range&quot;—that is, the full set of different hands that he could plausibly have, given all the actions that he has thus far taken.<p>I find it impossible to believe that concept of a &quot;range&quot; was (a) invented a few years ago and (b) invented by Phil Galfond. This article is disappointing.<p>Edit: In fairness, the article&#x27;s sentence is literally correct. But I cringe at its implication.
评论 #6113820 未加载
评论 #6115314 未加载
评论 #6113752 未加载
评论 #6115241 未加载
评论 #6115951 未加载
评论 #6114018 未加载
评论 #6117133 未加载
jackschultz将近 12 年前
There&#x27;s another element in there. The one about relative skill. Let&#x27;s say that you&#x27;re a much better player than the other person, and that you would win 90% of the time heads up (one on one, which we are going to assume at this point for simplicity). If this were the case, you would need to have a greater than 90% chance to win the hand all in for it to be a correct move.<p>This is also easy to understand if you, a novice, are heads up against one of the pros. It&#x27;s a much better move for you to go all in on any decent hand and just try to get lucky to win, since if you try to play their game, you&#x27;re going to lose.
评论 #6114538 未加载
评论 #6116525 未加载
评论 #6115526 未加载
评论 #6115313 未加载
tedsanders将近 12 年前
&gt;Bluffing still matters, but the best players now depend on math theory<p>This is a silly byline. If anything, the best and most mathematical players bluff more than the older generation of typically more conservative players. Bluffing and math are NOT opposed principles.
评论 #6114241 未加载
评论 #6113750 未加载
MichaelApproved将近 12 年前
For those interested in more poker discussions <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/poker" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;poker</a>
评论 #6114025 未加载
评论 #6114385 未加载
评论 #6116778 未加载
newernpguy将近 12 年前
There are some references that could be interesting:<p><a href="http://statspotting.com/is-poker-a-game-of-skill-or-chance/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;statspotting.com&#x2F;is-poker-a-game-of-skill-or-chance&#x2F;</a>