TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Wolfram Alpha: The Wikipedia Killer

17 点作者 darwinw大约 16 年前

10 条评论

tsally大约 16 年前
A lot of the mathematical proofs and descriptions of algorithms on Wikipedia are surprisingly well written. You're telling me Wolfram Alpha can replace that? In fact, Wikipedia is a completely different type of service.
评论 #613135 未加载
zimbabwe大约 16 年前
<i>life expectancy 40 year old male UK</i><p><i>GOOG YHOO</i><p><i>nathan name</i><p><i>president of nigeria 2004</i><p><i>weather seattle christmas day 2008</i><p><i>microsoft</i><p><i>ethnic groups nigeria</i><p>With the exception of Microsoft, none of these are questions I'd see myself typing into Wikipedia. Some of these might have tangential information available on Wiki, but this is not Wikipedia's meat and bones.<p>Wolfram Alpha is not going to kill anything. It provides a new kind of service, and if it becomes popular the only deaths will be of those services that offer very limited value to begin with.
评论 #612618 未加载
评论 #612509 未加载
评论 #612477 未加载
cellis大约 16 年前
If you read "%s Killer" anywhere on a news site, you can safely ignore it.
评论 #612844 未加载
nimbix大约 16 年前
I don't see WA as a Wikipedia killer. It's more like a working version of Wikipedia articles: read about a concept on Wikipedia, then try it out in practice using WA. I think they complement each other very nicely!
评论 #612793 未加载
russell大约 16 年前
XXX is the YYY killer is pretty much guaranteed to be wrong, esp. if YYY is good and thriving. (Hardware notwithstanding.)
评论 #612464 未加载
darkxanthos大约 16 年前
I'm getting very tired of the "Sorry, Wolfram Alpha is temporarily unavailable. Please try again." or "I'm sorry Dave".<p>Regardless of whether or not it's "released". It is "released" and I'll be avoiding it until it's less frustrating to use.
csomar大约 16 年前
It's the first time i hear about the site: It's great and promising. however if i happen to use it a lot in the future (and may be several times a day) it'll not replace Google.<p>This is not exactly an engine, it's a precious scientific tool<p>edit: i looked for Google and this showed me the last trade in our local currecncy (DT)!! this mean they have care about visitors from all over the world
patcito大约 16 年前
Wikipedia is one of the main source of data for Wolfram Alpha, so killing Wikipedia would make Wolfram suck if not die.
评论 #612605 未加载
travisjeffery大约 16 年前
Not only are the different things but it will take either a lot more time or a lot more effort before Wolfram Alpha can compete with the amount of information that Wikipedia has.
erlanger大约 16 年前
No, not even remotely:<p><a href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=ruy+lopez" rel="nofollow">http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=ruy+lopez</a><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruy_Lopez" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruy_Lopez</a>