TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Meet the Man Who Sold His Fate to Investors at $1 a Share

31 点作者 cwan将近 12 年前

8 条评论

j_s将近 12 年前
Previous discussion, ~187 comments back when this was published in March:<p><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5454147" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=5454147</a>
dgreensp将近 12 年前
This is so perfect, a parable for our age. A man with balls but no guts, deferring to the sort of terrible decisions made in boardrooms everywhere. Even when he knows what he wants, he wants the decision to come from someone else.
huherto将近 12 年前
I recently moved to USA and just noticed the extend of fame of the Kardashians. So I did a little research and it turns down that they don&#x27;t have any special skills or talents. They are just &quot;famous for being famous&quot;.<p>Imagine that a TV producer reads the article and decides to make a show about Mike Merrill where people get to vote what he does with his life. I can imagine a situation where the value of KMikeyM will soar. Once you become famous your value is not given by your own productivity. It is a strange world, but some people have been able to convert fame into money.
chasing将近 12 年前
He created 100,000 shares. 3,711 of those shares are in other peoples&#x27; hands. Sounds like he still controls about 96% of himself. So why does he care about their votes?<p>Anyway: This whole thing seems wildly narcissistic. Who gives a shit if he moves in with his girlfriend or gets a vasectomy? These are issues to be decided between KMikeyM and his friends&#x2F;family, not someone who gave him a few bucks for some fake &quot;shares.&quot; Especially if he doesn&#x27;t know that someone personally.
评论 #6127317 未加载
评论 #6127315 未加载
评论 #6128105 未加载
评论 #6127223 未加载
benjamincburns将近 12 年前
There&#x27;s plenty of discussion here (and the original thread back in March) about the social&#x2F;moral&#x2F;ethical issues behind this. What about the legal side? Is there any way he&#x27;s doing this legally - in such a way that the SEC, FTC, or similar gov&#x27;t entities wouldn&#x27;t shit all over it if they decided to pay attention? Even if he created a corporation with real stock, is it possible that he&#x27;s actually legally bound to it?<p>In other words, does the continued value of the stock hinge on your faith in his word, and your faith that the government won&#x27;t someday intervene?
评论 #6128138 未加载
X4将近 12 年前
This is the first time I want to downvote a story! This guy is crazy and I know that he wants to play the &quot;Trueman Show&quot; to get money through shares, while he literally puts money above human value. So egoistic... I&#x27;m speechless and shocked Mike!
wallacrw将近 12 年前
One of the most fascinating articles I&#x27;ve read in a long time.
lotsofcows将近 12 年前
Didn&#x27;t David Bowie do this 20 or 30 years ago?