Although I agree with the main point of this opinion piece ("Reading Aloud" is a Good Thing), the author comes across as a bit pretentious when he tries to capture the magical "je ne sais quoi" about reading aloud, and how young people (students) can't seem to do it right.<p>(1) "If the work is their own, they are usually trying to read the intention of the writer."<p>ummm, if it is their own work, then they <i>are</i> the writer. The words express their intention, so reading "the words" and reading "the intention of the writer" are the same thing.<p>(2) "It’s as though they’re reading what the words represent rather than the words themselves."<p>ummm, actually, when I read a story to my niece or nephew I don't just "read the words" (if that is all we wanted, we could have a text-to-speech program do it for us). Instead, I often read what the words represent.<p>"Who goes there?!" shouted the witch, angrily.<p>"No, no, you're doing it all wrong", whispered the grey-haired professor, almost inaudibly as he shook his head. "No young man", his deep voice admonished loudly, "Just read the words! Read the damn words."