TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Your protestations about “literally” are literally wrong

10 点作者 barretts将近 12 年前

5 条评论

captainmuon将近 12 年前
Oh god, this debate is getting old :-)<p>There are two ways to &quot;misuse&quot; &quot;literally&quot;: - You believe it means &quot;figuratively&quot; or &quot;metaphorically&quot;. Like: &quot;The hyperloop is a revolutionary technology, it is literally an iPhone&quot;. Using it in this way is plain wrong, no matter if you are descriptionist or perscriptionist. &quot;It doesn&#x27;t mean what you think it means.&quot; - You use it as hyperbole. &quot;I had such a hangover, my head literally exploded&quot;. Well, it certainly didn&#x27;t explode for real, it&#x27;s clear you&#x27;re exaggerating. Everyone knows it&#x27;s a metaphor, you just want to reinforce it. a la &quot;Really guys, it was almost as bad as if it really did explode&quot;. This is not wrong, but people often don&#x27;t get it (when they&#x27;re smart enough to know the difference, but don&#x27;t pick up the hyperbole) (- Or you could use it ironically and mix it up on purpose. However, people probably won&#x27;t get that either.)
Semiapies将近 12 年前
Word definitions are determined by usage, sure.<p>Guess what, though? Usage is defined by <i>what people think is correct</i>, including how they argue about that usage and what it &quot;should&quot; be.<p>If you embrace descriptivism, you don&#x27;t get to reject prescriptive arguments as &quot;wrong&quot; on the basis that <i>ZOMG, there are no rules</i>. It&#x27;s like saying a policy arguments is &quot;wrong&quot; because a poll reveals that people exist who don&#x27;t agree with that argument - you&#x27;re not even talking in the right context.<p>Or, put another way, if enough people continue to spell &quot;past&quot; as &quot;passed&quot; (&quot;I went passed the sign...&quot;), then eventually one of the definitions of &quot;passed&quot; will include &quot;alternate spelling of &#x27;past&#x27;&quot;. But someone <i>isn&#x27;t wrong</i> to say, &quot;That should be &#x27;past&#x27;, not &#x27;passed&#x27;.&quot;, even if some people are spelling it wrong.
lutusp将近 12 年前
I wish people would stop using the word &quot;wrong&quot; in this context. Words may have more than one meaning, and if people choose to use words that way, the meanings are not wrong even when they contradict each other.<p>Example -- Joe says about Larry, &quot;He&#x27;s really a baaad dude.&quot; The appropriate response is to determine the context of the remark, not assume the word is being misused.
评论 #6212857 未加载
pouzy将近 12 年前
Makes me think about &quot;Archer&quot;, they make a pretty good use of using it wrong.
jacalata将近 12 年前
This is stunningly similar to the kind of scathing comebacks littering my 7th grade diary. Thankfully, when I was 11 we didn&#x27;t publish our snarky takedowns online. This poor author will doubtless feel terrible when she grows up and looks back on the drivel that was published under her name.