Don't want to spark class warfare, but this really only seems to point out to me that rich kids who got into trouble during their rebellious stages get to be entrepreneurs later when they want to rebel against something else.<p>While I'm not silly enough to think that's always the case, the article seems to support it, someone prove me wrong:<p>Quote from the article:
"The economists find that self-employed workers with incorporated businesses were almost three times more likely to engage in illicit and risky activities as youth than were salaried workers. These behaviors include but aren’t limited to shoplifting, marijuana use, playing hooky at school, drug dealing and assault. In addition, the self-employed with incorporated businesses were more educated, more likely to come from high-earning, two-parent families, were more apt to score higher on learning aptitude tests and exhibit greater self-esteem than other employment types. “Of course, you have to be smart,” says Mr. Levine. “But it’s a unique combination of breaking rules and being smart that helps you become an entrepreneur.”