TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

What Medium Is

24 点作者 clarkm超过 11 年前

4 条评论

ser0超过 11 年前
I think the author&#x27;s point is reasonable, that Medium attempts to act as a &#x27;YouTube&#x27; for articles. However, I believe there are key differences at this point in Medium&#x27;s evolution (I do believe they will change their model over time).<p>For me, thinking writing an article, Medium offers the following: a possible readership&#x2F;distribution (assuming I get picked up by editors), no long term commitments, no investment in set up (as opposed to a hosted personal blog), and little friction in posting.<p>As an idea, having a streamlined essay posting &amp; sharing process seems good, however I think that Medium will need to address the following issues going forward:<p>* Serious authors will eventually want to build their own identity&#x2F;brand. I think much of posts in HN that criticise Medium comes down to this issue. When you write for Medium, you almost seem to detach yourself from the work. YouTube addresses this problem by offering channels with revenue sharing. This means that the amount of time required to publish a piece of quality output for free can be justified to some degree. For Medium though, I see this limitation as restricting its content to be published by those that do not intent to write regularly and do not already have an outlet for their writing.<p>* Dealing with signal vs noise. Assuming the above is not addressed, and Medium continues to be a place where semi-serious, or novice, authors essentially practice their craft, then there will be a lot of crap for people to sift through in order to read some content that appeals to them. If Medium editors are tasked with this job, that in itself would be a manual process that would be difficult to scale.<p>* Curating content when authors have no commitments. When people write a blog, it needs a title, which will usually indicate what the general topic of the blog is about. Although authors can deviate from time to time, I find most successful blogs are generally on-topic as the author develops expertise both in the area of interest and in his&#x2F;her ability to communicate their ideas surround the topic. However, on Medium, this commitment is no longer required. You can sign in, write, and your output is only loosely linked to you as an author. This means that there is no simple predictor of content category and quality.<p>Personally, I would very much like to see a platform where people can post, be read, and ideally get some compensation for their writing if they can find an audience; basically YouTube for writers as the article states. However, I think Medium is still a fair way away from that model at this point.
评论 #6266527 未加载
jeffehobbs超过 11 年前
If a platform has to work this hard to define and explain what it is, it might not be that great of a platform.<p>Still unsold: Why is Medium better for individual expression than starting your own blog?<p>Further: If SEO is doing what it should do, why should I care how my articles are arranged on my own site? What genuine advantage does Medium offer regular, non-hyper-connected authors (especially in it&#x27;s current, invite-only publishing state)?
评论 #6267588 未加载
larrys超过 11 年前
In essence simply an attempt by a friend (fully disclosed in paragraph one and worn as a badge of honor) to get more discussion and press around medium. Part of the campaign to gain an audience for medium.<p>(Of course not taking Anil&#x27;s reputation into account this would actually work much better w&#x2F;o the offered disclosure allowing someone else to point that out and for Anil to respond to the controversy and create more press and commentary.)
评论 #6266962 未加载
selfexperiments超过 11 年前
Why all the verbiage? The essence of Medium should be described in two sentences.