TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Vasili Arkhipov

200 点作者 jbevain超过 11 年前

17 条评论

strlen超过 11 年前
Interesting tidbit: when I describe my Soviet and early post-Soviet childhood to Americans, Americans of my age are surprised that their fears of Soviet nuclear attack, civil defense training (&quot;duck and cover&quot;), were not unique. &quot;Whoa, you thought we were going to nuke you?! We thought you were going to nuke us.&quot; A popular (not very politically correct by US standards!) Soviet joke of this time conveyed the cynicism around the idea that once a nuclear war began, humanity would have any hope--<p>Armenian Radio (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_Yerevan_jokes" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Radio_Yerevan_jokes</a>) was asked: &quot;what do to if a nuclear attack is imminent?&quot;<p>Armenian Radio responded: &quot;wrap yourself in a linen sheet and slowly, in organized fashion, without creating any panic, crawl to a cemetery.&quot;<p>To paraphrase War Games (a classic which I watched only after coming to the US), the winning move is not to play.&quot;
guantes超过 11 年前
This is another interesting story about a Russian who may have saved the world: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanislav_Petrov" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Stanislav_Petrov</a>
评论 #6270405 未加载
评论 #6270875 未加载
评论 #6270538 未加载
评论 #6270418 未加载
评论 #6270594 未加载
packetslave超过 11 年前
Oh look, another title edit that adds nothing and takes away from the original title that actually told us why we should care about Vasili Arkhipov. Get it together, mods!
评论 #6271046 未加载
shurcooL超过 11 年前
It&#x27;s a lonely and sad thought that the biggest heroes whose immense sacrifices and contributions to the well being of everyone around them are celebrated by... the blissful ignorance of everyone else.<p>Except in movies. There, we get to see and experience it all.
评论 #6270820 未加载
评论 #6270595 未加载
评论 #6271270 未加载
rismay超过 11 年前
I was lucky enough to learn about this in high school - Andover. I forget the speakers name but he gave the speech between 2001 - 2005 (I can&#x27;t remember). It was an incredible speech about Mutually Assured Destruction and how the theory was absurd. The speaker pointed out that no one thought that we would exit the Cold War without a horrible war. And then he asked, &quot;Why did this not happen?&quot; He pointed to Vasili&#x27;s example as to how one SANE person can make a difference. He talked about several other examples. He ended the speech by repeating, &quot;PEACE. PEACE. PEACE.&quot; At the moment I thought it was cheesy... but here I am more than 10 years later and I still remember it.
评论 #6273002 未加载
Killah911超过 11 年前
It&#x27;s a shame that we have gotten ourselves to a point where we must rely on the level headed decision making of so few people to keep us from annihilation. To say &#x27;saved&#x27; may be a bit premature. It&#x27;s more of a shame that we have created such monstrosities with the gifts of technology and have kept them around and continue to threaten our very own existence with them. Here&#x27;s to hoping for cooler heads and compassion to always prevail, for all our sakes.
Shivetya超过 11 年前
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4VPY2SgyG5w" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=4VPY2SgyG5w</a> is an hour long documentary about this man and the incident he is famous for
keithpeter超过 11 年前
<i>&quot;Three officers on board the submarine [...] were authorized to launch the torpedo if agreeing unanimously in favor of doing so. An argument broke out among the three, in which only Arkhipov was against the launch.&quot;</i><p>Opportunity for a playwright to write a really tight two scene piece there. Doubt if we could get it up to 50,000 words[1] even if we did the &#x27;follow three scenarios with multiple endings&#x27; trick, and even if we had the Bobby Kennedy&#x2F;LBJ dynamic in the committee going.<p>Edit: The K-19 &#x27;incident&#x27; would have made a major psychological impression on <i>anyone</i>, even allowing for the high threshold that I imagine Soviet navy commanders of that era had.[2]<p>[1] <a href="http://nanowrimo.org/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;nanowrimo.org&#x2F;</a><p>[2] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_submarine_K-19" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Soviet_submarine_K-19</a>
评论 #6273549 未加载
snird超过 11 年前
the guardian wrote about his story: <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/oct/27/vasili-arkhipov-stopped-nuclear-war" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;commentisfree&#x2F;2012&#x2F;oct&#x2F;27&#x2F;vasili-...</a>
austinz超过 11 年前
Well, I&#x27;m glad the worst is over. It&#x27;s chilling how many near misses there were. How many more near misses might we have endured, had the Cold War gone on, before the one not-any-kind-of-miss that would have destroyed human civilization?
评论 #6270675 未加载
erbo超过 11 年前
An essay in the book <i>What Ifs? of American History</i> (Robert Cowley, ed.) by Robert L. O&#x27;Connell, &quot;The Cuban Missile Crisis: Second Holocaust,&quot; details what might have happened if Arkhipov had not been successful and the <i>Randolph</i> had in fact been hit by a nuclear torpedo.<p>In the aftermath, the U.S. military executes air strikes on Cuba followed by an invasion. The Soviet forces obliterate Guantanamo with a nuclear strike, send nuclear cruise missiles at the incoming invasion force,and, most seriously, manage to launch two of the SS-4 missiles...one of which hits Washington D.C. and wipes out the entire National Command Authority. In response, U.S. forces execute the entire SIOP against the Soviet Union, an effort which gives &quot;overkill&quot; a new name.<p>The aftermath of &quot;The Two Days&#x27; War&quot; includes the near-extermination of the Soviet Union, radiation issues in large parts of the world, and a &quot;nuclear twilight&quot; causing worldwide food shortages and famine. Ultimately, the United States was viewed as the aggressor by the rest of the world, compounded by the actions of President Richard Nixon (elected in 1964, replacing Acting President John McCormack). The U.S. stood alone in refusing to join the Geneva Convention for the Abolition of Nuclear Armaments in 1966, and renounced UN membership in 1968, ordering the organization out of New York City. The American public felt Nixon had taken the wrong turn, and elected Eugene McCarthy to succeed him in 1972.<p>The essay is written as the report of an investigative commission written in 1972 and finally declassified in 2002, in part by the actions of U.S. Archivist Newton Leroy Gingrich (who never went into politics in this timeline) at the New Capital District in Cheyenne Mountain, Colorado.
Houshalter超过 11 年前
Should we extend Petrov Day to him too? <a href="http://lesswrong.com/lw/jq/926_is_petrov_day/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;lesswrong.com&#x2F;lw&#x2F;jq&#x2F;926_is_petrov_day&#x2F;</a>
Intimatik超过 11 年前
Holly Molly, I live 1 mile far from this guy&#x27;s last home(which was in Kupavna, Moscow region, a place where Russian air defense command resides)
guard-of-terra超过 11 年前
Vice Admiral is hardly &quot;a guy&quot;, while I&#x27;m not sure he had this rank at the time of incedent.
评论 #6270302 未加载
dredmorbius超过 11 年前
Спасибо, товарищ.
评论 #6271318 未加载
D9u超过 11 年前
We read about this 7 months ago...<p><a href="https://paste.xinu.at/hVamTs/" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;paste.xinu.at&#x2F;hVamTs&#x2F;</a>
mnml_超过 11 年前
Great story, but not really tech related
评论 #6270551 未加载
评论 #6271490 未加载