TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

NSA spied on UN, breaking active agreements

70 点作者 sarnowski超过 11 年前

7 条评论

njuyhbgtrfvcdew超过 11 年前
Some English translations from the original German:<p><pre><code> New documents prove to SPIEGEL information: Even the United Nations headquarters in New York was tapped by the U.S. NSA, although an agreement prohibiting just that. Even the U.S. Consulate in Frankfurt served as a listening post. ----- The U.S. Secret NSA has not only the European Union bugged, but also the headquarters of the United Nations. This is evident from the NSA secret documents, the DER SPIEGEL has analyzed. ----- &gt; &quot;The traffic gives us the internal video teleconferencing the UN (yay!).&quot; Within three weeks, the number of decrypted communications had risen from 12 to 458th In one case, the NSA had also caught the Chinese intelligence in it, also a spy.</code></pre>
stalled超过 11 年前
See also, GigaOM article:<p><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6271259" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=6271259</a>
webreac超过 11 年前
Very difficult to read if you do not understand German. The German text is clearly written, but The google translation is awful. Is it a plot of Google to convince people to learn foreign languages ?
评论 #6271363 未加载
greenyoda超过 11 年前
Not only did the NSA spy on the UN, but Hillary Clinton instructed State Department employees to spy on the UN. Here&#x27;s an article from Der Spiegel from 2009 that I stumbled upon:<p><a href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/diplomats-or-spooks-how-us-diplomats-were-told-to-spy-on-un-and-ban-ki-moon-a-731747.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.spiegel.de&#x2F;international&#x2F;world&#x2F;diplomats-or-spook...</a><p>And this spying by the State Department may have provided the NSA with the information they needed to do their own spying:<p><i>&quot;The State Department was also particularly interested in the UN&#x27;s internal communications facilities. In her wish list, Clinton wanted to find out everything possible about the organization&#x27;s telecommunications infrastructure and also extensive information on &quot;current technical specifications, physical layout, and planned upgrades to telecommunications infrastructure and information systems, networks, and technologies used by top officials and their support staffs.&quot; The intention seems clear: This information would make it easier for the National Security Agency, the US intelligence agency responsible for wiretapping of phones and interception of electronic communications, to easily attack telephone, computer and e-mail accounts.&quot;</i><p>This information came from the diplomatic cables leaked to WikiLeaks by Bradley Manning.
Questioneer超过 11 年前
To summarize my two other comments, talk of anything remotely against the whims of HN mods gets your account, your submissions deaded.<p>Nevermind how _hackers_ who have taken on the White House, Washington Post and others are defecting against Assad due to his chemical attacks[1]. The topic involves a whiff of politics so it must be moderated against! Any hacker, technical, code related aspects are ignored if one shred of the topic goes against the whims of HN mods.<p>[1] <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6252592" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=6252592</a>
评论 #6271332 未加载
Questioneer超过 11 年前
One of my accounts was hell-banned for this very topic.<p>If HN wants to halt discussion they are finding a very effective way to do so.<p>edit: Why is this comment getting down-voted? Must I start collating a list of users complaining their submissions are being overrode by others? Or show how they get down-voted&#x2F;dismissed when bringing it up?<p>Is this what HN has come to?
评论 #6271316 未加载
Questioneer超过 11 年前
Infact, in another topic I provided very technical details to an event being linked[1]. That article was deaded, rendering my commentary on the technical aspects useless.<p>[1] <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6248144" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=6248144</a><p>edit: In-case users are down-voting before reading what was linked. The comments I provided showed how monitoring hardware was used to track people of &#x27;interest&#x27; like religious followers. I have been attempting to focus on the ramifications for hardware like Bluecoat&#x27;s ending up being used to monitor and persecute others.<p>This persecution is not just using to harass others but to know what leaders of Sunnis to &#x27;cleanse&#x27; as to make populating Alawites easier[2].<p>[2] <a href="http://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/syrian-army-renews-offensive-homs" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.understandingwar.org&#x2F;backgrounder&#x2F;syrian-army-ren...</a>