TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

YouTube costs Google $2 million per day

7 点作者 zeedotme大约 16 年前

8 条评论

kierank大约 16 年前
Every other week these figures appear and every time on HN they are debunked.<p>The Credit Suisse analyst's report has little idea about how delivering large amounts of data on the net works. See my previous comments on this story for more information.
评论 #629500 未加载
评论 #629553 未加载
mdasen大约 16 年前
Based on Credit Suisse's bandwidth cost estimate, it seems like YouTube would have to be pushing more than 10PB per day (petabytes). That's assuming a $0.10/GB bandwidth cost. Now, I'm sure that Google is getting a lower bandwidth cost than I can get on a dedicated server as just me with my credit card.<p>So, I think it's safe to assume from those numbers that Google's pushing a few dozen petabytes from YouTube every day. That's a lot of data.
blhack大约 16 年前
Maybe this is a stupid question, but why is google paying for bandwidth at all?<p>Why doesn't google own their own bandwidth provider? Didn't they buy up a bunch of dark fiber a while ago?<p>Lease it to the providers and use that to subsidize their own bandwidth. Or am I totally missing the point?
评论 #629440 未加载
评论 #629713 未加载
评论 #629433 未加载
dspeyer大约 16 年前
There was a big media frenzy back when Google first announced its edge-caches physically located in ISP server rooms: <a href="http://techliberation.com/2008/12/16/edge-caching-vs-preferential-treatment/" rel="nofollow">http://techliberation.com/2008/12/16/edge-caching-vs-prefere...</a> <a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/The-Wall-Street-Journals-Google-Hatchet-Job-99684" rel="nofollow">http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/The-Wall-Street-Journals-...</a> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122929270127905065.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122929270127905065.html</a> <a href="http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2008/12/net-neutrality-and-benefits-of-caching.html" rel="nofollow">http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2008/12/net-neutralit...</a><p>Why has everyone forgotten?
lurkinggrue大约 16 年前
Yes, but that is $2 million in internet dollars.
zandorg大约 16 年前
Eric Schmidt was talking about how 'micropayments' were the solution. Maybe people would pay a couple cents per video.
评论 #629417 未加载
oldgregg大约 16 年前
I'm guessing they can hold out long enough for flash p2p penetration.
Zarathu大约 16 年前
Cool! So, what else is new?<p>Facebook isn't making any money?!