TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Non-Libertarian FAQ (aka Why I Hate Your Freedom)

22 点作者 czr80超过 11 年前

4 条评论

essrinn超过 11 年前
The author constructs a ridiculous false dichotomy of tallists vs shortists as a comparison for libertarianism vs statism to say that you cannot equate non-libertarian views with statist views. However, he immediately follows this by stating that some American Libertarians believe government can do no right and private industry can do no wrong.<p>The author is confusing the central tenet of libertarianism with a false dichotomy of the author&#x27;s own construction between government and private enterprise. The primary goal of libertarianism is individual liberty. Each person should be able to live their life as he or she chooses without having force used against their person to coerce them to do things they otherwise would not do.<p>To interpret some American Libertarians views as &#x27;all government is bad and all private industry is good&#x27; shows an incredible amount of naiveté. The author is inferring a general principle from specific arguments having missed the primary point. The reason you see so many specific arguments against government and for private industry in the modern day USA is not because anyone believes that government is inherently wrong but rather because what the government provides must necessarily be provided by the use of force. The government&#x27;s chief source of income is taxation which is the application of force to private citizens to extract money.<p>Most libertarians support the government providing a few limited key services such as national defense and operating a police force. Where you see libertarians start balking at government services is when they reach out beyond the scope of protecting an individual from the use of force by another. In so expanding its scope, the government becomes that which it was created to defend against.
评论 #6316079 未加载
BerislavLopac超过 11 年前
&quot;0.5: Why write a Non-Libertarian FAQ? Isn&#x27;t statism a bigger problem than libertarianism?<p>Yes. But you never run into Stalinists at parties. At least not serious Stalinists over the age of twenty-five, and not the interesting type of parties. If I did, I guess I&#x27;d try to convince them not to be so statist, but the issue&#x27;s never come up.&quot;<p>Well I guess the author lives in a wrong country. I&#x27;ve ran into many, if not Stalinists, then certainly Marxists and Leninists in my life.
评论 #6314836 未加载
评论 #6314897 未加载
goshakkk超过 11 年前
&gt; Another example of externalities would be a widget factory that spews carcinogenic chemicals into the air. When I trade with the widget factory I&#x27;m benefitting - I get widgets - and they&#x27;re benefitting - they get money. But the people who breathe in the carcinogenic chemicals weren&#x27;t consulted in the trade.<p>Well, actually, polluting the air is not a problem by itself, of course... but there is another perspective: if you&#x27;re spewing chemicals into the air, you are forcedly taking the rights in lungs, fields, and other property of people living nearby.<p>That&#x27;s an act of aggression, and therefore libertarianism is against it. But the article makes it sound as if &quot;voluntary exchange&quot; is all libertarianism is about, ignoring nonaggression principle.
评论 #6315810 未加载
评论 #6315163 未加载
lotsofcows超过 11 年前
Given that there&#x27;s only a very occasional link to any sort of supporting evidence this should not be labeled a FAQ. It&#x27;s more of a manifesto.
评论 #6320645 未加载