TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Would you pay $30/m to move your resume to top of applicant list?

3 点作者 lambersley超过 11 年前

3 条评论

dragonwriter超过 11 年前
&gt; Would you pay $30&#x2F;m to move your resume to top of applicant list?<p>Maybe, but if I was hiring, why would I use a service that allowed an applicant to do that (unless I can easily identify and disregard the applicants that are placed by payment rather than qualification)? I mean, if it was a fee to move their application to the top of the list for a particular opening, it might be vaguely useful as a screen for motivation or interest level, but paying $30&#x2F;month to make themselves a &quot;featured applicant&quot; for all applications means that, as a hiring party, the system just became less useful for me. And if hiring parties stop using it (or continue to use it because they can easily disregard the out-of-order listings), the paid premium service isn&#x27;t useful for job seekers.
tompko超过 11 年前
&quot;your application will move to the top of the pile...regardless of your qualifications.&quot;<p>I&#x27;ve not used the LinkedIn job boards, but the rest of the article implies that the rest of the list is sorted with the &quot;most qualified&quot; at the top. If the second part of the above quote is true, I&#x27;d be skipping straight past the &quot;featured applicants&quot; to the ones who are there because they have the best qualifications.
lambersley超过 11 年前
I have paid for express postage, line-bypass at a club, &#x27;rush&#x27; passport service, expressway tolls and many similar services, so why wouldn&#x27;t I as a serious job-seeker, pay to have my application move to the top of the pile?
评论 #6321833 未加载