TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Are haters gonna hate?

2 点作者 dsimms超过 11 年前

1 comment

lutusp超过 11 年前
Quote: &quot;To test out this theory, a team of psychologists ...&quot;<p>... performed a study that&#x27;s neither scientific nor falsifiable, that tests a nebulous idea so vague that different people would have a difficult time agreeing on what the idea is, and that will be completely forgotten six months from now.<p>Even though such studies aren&#x27;t science, they produce a huge amount of article copy, and that&#x27;s the point. But worse, a large percentage of psychology&#x27;s content is simply made up:<p>Link: <a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/people-events/2012/11/final-report-stapel-affair-points-bigger-problems-social-psychology" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.sciencemag.org&#x2F;people-events&#x2F;2012&#x2F;11&#x2F;final-repor...</a><p>Quote: &quot;In their exhaustive final report about the fraud affair that rocked social psychology last year, three investigative panels today collectively find fault with the field itself. They paint an image of a &quot;sloppy&quot; research culture in which some scientists don&#x27;t understand the essentials of statistics, journal-selected article reviewers encourage researchers to leave unwelcome data out of their papers, and even the most prestigious journals print results that are obviously too good to be true.&quot;