Tractors may be getting smarter, but <i>the entire notion of large-scale monocrop farming is basically forkin' stupid</i>.<p>Through recent research I developed the distinct impression that anyone who has managed land for an extended period+ with and without modern industrial farming methodology seemed to say that the general outcome of such was dependence on external entities for seeds, technology, energy, fertiliser and pesticides... and this seems to include both academia and government bodies in charge of agricultural knowledge dissemination.<p>The most lucid illustrations of this quandry I have yet encountered are Masanobu Fukuoka's <i>One Straw Revolution</i> (a few decades ago) and the USDA's <i>Alley Cropping</i> instructional video series: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8Kwb5yInPM" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8Kwb5yInPM</a><p>Basically, the claim is that higher yields with lower maintenance are possible through non-industrialised methods that rely on crop diversity and natural systems.<p>My impression is that the US (and Europe) heavily subsidise or artificially protect a lot of their agriculture whilst burning loads of fossil fuels to plant, maintain and harvest them which is a situation that has partly evolved to cater to vested interests in government and energy sectors.<p>China wastes loads of food, leads the world in agricultural research, and certainly does not yet have anything like a food crisis. Not only that, but their population is stable or dropping.<p>Overall, this article is pretty FUD.<p>+ Not I!