TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

TogetherJS + Firebase

41 点作者 jamest超过 11 年前

4 条评论

anant超过 11 年前
I wrote this integration with Firebase - kudos to the TogetherJS team - the source code was remarkably easy to understand and very modular! I just had to create a new messaging channel implementation - it already supports WebSockets and postMessage (the latter seems to be unused?).<p>Adding a Firebase backend to this was as easy as implementing a few methods, took less than 50 lines of code: <a href="https://github.com/firebase/togetherjs/blob/develop/togetherjs/channels.js#L200" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;firebase&#x2F;togetherjs&#x2F;blob&#x2F;develop&#x2F;together...</a>
评论 #6421340 未加载
616c超过 11 年前
I keep saying it, and downvote me if you wish. Screw Firebase, and long live any initiative from Mozilla. I am not going to shove my data, realtime or not, through some commercial service I have no intention of paying for and exposing myself to the same non-sense as before.<p>However, I will give Mozilla a hard time this time around: the README on Github kind of dismisses my desire to host my own TogetherJS&#x2F;TowTruck server. I am sad only because with other projects, like Firefox Sync and to some extent Persona once the code is stableish, they encourage people hosting their own server-side components.<p>In any event, no Firebase for me. Thanks.
评论 #6421332 未加载
评论 #6422907 未加载
评论 #6421009 未加载
评论 #6421057 未加载
评论 #6421234 未加载
KaoruAoiShiho超过 11 年前
I would like Firebase a lot more if they didn&#x27;t:<p>1. Raise prices twice in 3 months.<p>2. Crash all the damn time.<p>3. Do maintenance at peak times.<p>4. Have buggy integration software.<p>As it is Firebase is pretty bad.
评论 #6421358 未加载
Keyframe超过 11 年前
First time I see togetherJS, seems a bit on the sluggish side, great premise though.