TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

We're creating a culture of distraction

166 点作者 0x10c0fe11ce超过 11 年前

45 条评论

alan_cx超过 11 年前
Just one of those observations:<p>A while ago, could be 3 or so years, I was in my local fish and chip shop. For those who don&#x27;t know, there are small take away food shops in the UK (and I guess else where) and generally you wander up, order your food, then usually wait a few minutes while your order is put together or cooked. 10 mins or so. (I like the wait because usually it means my food is being cooked fresh.)<p>Usually I stand to the side waiting, and just gaze around, usually at the world going by out side the window. Normally the customers are not just one off people, but a couples or a pair of friends, or a parent and kids, and so on. You know, a decent variety of however people come. Usually there is a bit of a buzz of conversation and what not.<p>This time, I looked up, and all 10 or so of the people waiting in the show were literally buried, absorbed in their smart phones, and the shop stood stark silence. The people on their own, the kids, the parents, the couples, the whole damn lot. The only sounds were of the people working in the shop preparing the food.<p>Usually when the food is cooked, the person behind the counter only needs to mention the beginning of the order and the right person usually snaps in to action to retrieved their food, and leave the shop. This time I noticed it took up to 3 or 4 attempts before the smart phone spell was broken and the person realized their food was ready.<p>And the weirdest thing was, as they came to, coming out of their smart phone spell, each and every one of them had that look of some one who had just woken up in the morning. Eyes blinking, rubbing eyes, the slow realization of where you are, what you are doing, what comes next, etc.<p>I found the whole thing incredible creepy.<p>And since then, I&#x27;ve seen it more and more. In fact, I have even been round people houses or in a pub, where there are a few people meeting up, and I&#x27;ve observed the exact same thing. Oh, add to that, railway stations, bus stops, and so on.<p>OK, smart phones are very, very useful. Great little devices. But Im not so sure about they way people use them. Seems to me there must be something socially damaging about over use. Its like having the kid who is (exaggerate to show the point time) 24&#x2F;7 in his&#x2F;her bedroom on their computer. Now its like that but we can take the computer everywhere. Yeah, we can isolate ourselves anywhere.
评论 #6450523 未加载
评论 #6450391 未加载
评论 #6450737 未加载
评论 #6452743 未加载
评论 #6451341 未加载
评论 #6450689 未加载
评论 #6451979 未加载
评论 #6451143 未加载
评论 #6456758 未加载
评论 #6450748 未加载
julianpye超过 11 年前
I think part of this trend has to do with the fact that many people tend to have fear&#x2F;anxiety issues, when they have nothing to do. We have lost the capability to truly relax, even to bore ourselves. When we are not active, we worry, so we constantly distract ourselves from these feelings of anxiety.<p>Another example - a few years ago there was a huge trend of housewives playing Hidden-image games. It turns out that these games were so simple that people could do them in parallel with other tasks such as being on the phone, but they created a level of &#x27;noise&#x27; that kept them from worrying about their lives. It&#x27;s quasi electronic self-medication.
评论 #6450077 未加载
评论 #6450106 未加载
Lagged2Death超过 11 年前
Several times, this article mentions the notion - without really explaining it - that we have &quot;anxiety of being understimulated.&quot;<p>I think I understand what the author means, but I&#x27;m not sure that&#x27;s quite right. I agree with the main points that the author is making, but I wonder if this &quot;culture of distraction&quot; is really a symptom of an even larger problem. Consider the possibility that many of us are simply highly anxious just about all of the time, and that the distractions presented by wired life are things we seek out for relief on purpose. That is, that the distractions aren&#x27;t the cause of the anxiety, but a symptom.<p>Maybe checking in with Twitter over and over again isn&#x27;t &quot;stimulation,&quot; maybe it&#x27;s more like a narcotic. It helps us block out genuine, serious anxieties about money, jobs, work, family, and the future in general with easily-digested, glittery trivia.<p>One possible reason to think about the problem this way - although it may sound like a big change in subject at first - is antidepressant sales, which have been climbing for years and now stand at record levels. Clearly, for whatever reason, we&#x27;ve built a way of life for ourselves that leaves a huge percentage of us desperately unhappy and stressed out for an awful lot of the time.<p>Perhaps the explosion of smartphones and tablets, of portable, pocketable &quot;brain stimulation&quot; is, for many people, a form of self-medication. When you have a moment of downtime, and you have a chance to think about just how screwed you and your family are if your name comes up in this next round of layoffs, you can instead reach in your pocket and check out the latest celebrity scandal. When a free moment strikes and you find yourself wondering what sort of fascist nightmare future-US your children are going to be stuck with, you can instead check out the latest shiny aspirational gadgets.<p>Regardless of the cause, the &quot;culture of distraction&quot; is still a real phenomenon worth fighting, I think. But maybe we can fight it more successfully if we understand the causes more completely.
评论 #6452848 未加载
评论 #6452496 未加载
yesbabyyes超过 11 年前
&quot;All of humanity&#x27;s problems stem from man&#x27;s inability to sit quietly in a room alone.&quot; - Blaise Pascal<p>Also, Louis CK on smartphones: <a href="http://gawker.com/louis-c-k-s-explanation-of-why-he-hates-smartphones-is-1354954625" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;gawker.com&#x2F;louis-c-k-s-explanation-of-why-he-hates-sm...</a>
评论 #6450160 未加载
评论 #6450548 未加载
javajosh超过 11 年前
This post is dripping with irony because it is, itself, a form of distraction. Why? Because it doesn&#x27;t offer any objective evidence for it&#x27;s assertions. It is prescriptive distraction, a kind of modern, well-meaning form of muckraking that is a kind of politically passive aggressive post-apocalyptic self-help piece. (Don&#x27;t get me wrong, I love writing these sorts of things as much as the next guy, but I keep them in my private journal.)<p>The older I get the more skeptical I feel about any of my own attitudes that I don&#x27;t have clear objective evidence for, especially the kind of vague forebodings that motivate this sort of piece. There are entire &quot;hidden worlds&quot; out there, where people are motivated by completely different things. &quot;Ours is a culture of distraction.&quot; Which culture? There are so many cultures in the world, and even in the US, and even in Silicon Valley.<p>Yes, I too see people walking around with their eyes downcast at their phones, consumed by far-away happenings. And it certainly <i>feels</i> like &quot;we&quot; are more disconnected from each other. But these are feelings, and should be treated as an impetus to look more deeply into the fact of the matter, rather than rush to diagnose and treat an ailment which you don&#x27;t understand on any objective scale. And indeed, the first and best place to start looking is within yourself, and within your own life. Because the flip side to recognizing any kind of pan-cultural doom is living the alternative. That&#x27;s the really cool thing about culture, is that it is not enforced by law, you can indeed break from it in very meaningful ways.<p>An article documenting your experience breaking from the culture, with the implicit message that you found something lacking and went on a search to find it, would be far more valuable than subjective analysis. Because, as fun as your subjective analysis is to read, without action it is merely distraction.
mattjaynes超过 11 年前
I battle with this and one thing that&#x27;s been helping me a lot is &quot;Letting It Cool&quot;. By that I mean that I delay reading &quot;new&quot; things until they&#x27;ve had a chance to lose their &quot;newness&quot;.<p>I&#x27;ve found that <i>newness</i> is a false signal for value. Just because something is <i>new</i>, we tend to errantly assign extra value to it.<p>You can combat this by removing the <i>new</i> quality from the item by putting it somewhere where it can &quot;cool down&quot;.<p>For me, I save all the articles I want to read for the weekend. I just email the articles to myself and they go in a special folder and that&#x27;s where they cool off for a few days.<p>When you first start doing this, it is surprising how much some articles lose their perceived value over a few days. An article that I was really excited about when I first saw it will often induce a &quot;meh&quot; a few days later.<p>On the other hand, some articles still retain their value and appeal several days later.<p>I end up spending far fewer hours a week reading articles because of this method. It also helps to keep me focused since I don&#x27;t let my mind wander to other topics during my work day.<p>This also works for other things like movies, tv shows, facebook, etc. If you want to see the true value of something, delay enjoying it until the newness has worn off. It helps reduce what you consume and increases the quality of what you do.<p>If your goal is to produce more and consume less, then this strategy can really help.<p><a href="http://devopsu.com/blog/productivity-tip-let-it-cool/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;devopsu.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;productivity-tip-let-it-cool&#x2F;</a>
cafard超过 11 年前
&quot;Smoking has gone out. To be sure, it is a shocking thing, blowing smoke out of our mouths into other people&#x27;s mouths, eyes, and noses, and having the same thing done to us. Yet I cannot account, why a thing which requires so little exertion, and yet preserves the mind from total vacuity, should have gone out. Every man has something by which he calms himself: beating with his feet, or so.&quot;<p>Samuel Johnson, quoted in Boswell&#x27;s *Tour of the Hebrides&quot;, entry for August 19.
speeder超过 11 年前
I desperately need to fix this.<p>Since I was a kid I was known to quickly get bored, and then read something, annoying teachers. But back then I could sit still at home and make levels for my favourite games hours at end<p>Now since I got this goddmn.smartphone for professional reasons ( got phone in 2011, but work making smartphone games since 2008) I am getting more and more easily distracted and anxious, there was even a day recently that I spent the whole day looking at Facebook, Wikipedia, Wikis, tvtropes, hn, newspapers, and other random shit, and when it was time to go home, I noticed that I never even opened my IDE :(
评论 #6450668 未加载
评论 #6450501 未加载
reneherse超过 11 年前
Powerful stuff. I&#x27;ve noticed that my &quot;long form&quot; mental focus has gradually declined, I believe beginning from about the time I began using a smartphone a couple of years ago. It&#x27;s now so bad that if I can&#x27;t improve it through developing good habits, I&#x27;ll be ditching the smart phone for a dumb one, and finding other ways to curtail short-form reading and internet browsing :)<p>A relevant plug: My brother and I are developing a web app to help with this problem of distractedness. It&#x27;s a to-do list manager that encourages mindfulness by helping you monitor procrastination and training your ability to steadily focus. Launching sometime this fall: <a href="http://fleur.io" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;fleur.io</a>
评论 #6451005 未加载
WickyNilliams超过 11 年前
Scott Adams, author of Dilbert, wrote an interesting piece on this before. He argues that we&#x27;ve effectively eliminated boredom and that it really isn&#x27;t a good thing. Why? Because bored people are compelled to do stuff, whether it be creative thinking or seeking out a new experience. When boredom relief is cheap and readily-available then we lose the need for these things.<p>It&#x27;s a great read: <a href="http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/creativity/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;dilbert.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;entry&#x2F;creativity&#x2F;</a>
评论 #6450362 未加载
FrojoS超过 11 年前
My personally theory is, that this development has been going on for thousands of years. As we find better ways to deliver messages, e.g. horses, pigeons, telegraph, telephone, eMail, twitter, our time horizon has apparently been shrinking accordingly. Think about the cathedrals which took hundreds of years to build. The mindset that was required for such undertakings seems almost alien now.
评论 #6450180 未加载
评论 #6450840 未加载
评论 #6450125 未加载
casca超过 11 年前
While I agree that this is a phenomenon, it&#x27;s too soon to tell how it will play out. It&#x27;s not possible to be meaningfully productive if you&#x27;re unable to focus, so this could just be a function of the ages which are represented. Perhaps they&#x27;ll learn through the requirements of higher education? I&#x27;ve regularly espoused that the biggest advantage to hiring someone with a degree is that they&#x27;ve shown that they can complete a pointless task that they don&#x27;t enjoy.<p>Direct link to video: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzpX0TLKS9Q" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=EzpX0TLKS9Q</a>
评论 #6450016 未加载
spindritf超过 11 年前
&gt; One step, I think, is to take a weekly holiday from your devices.<p>You have just lost. Denying yourself something is not a viable way to avoid it. (Don&#x27;t think about elephants.)<p>There are only two solutions here. Either become someone else, change yourself so that you do not crave it any more, or displace it with something else.<p>If you want to be fit, or at least less flabby, the psychologically viable route is to tell yourself &quot;I am the kind of person who does 50 pushups after getting out of bed in the morning.&quot; Or, &quot;I am the kind of person who cooks his own low-carb meals.&quot; And then actually become that person.<p>If you don&#x27;t want to stare at your phone in a public place, displace that behaviour with something else. &quot;Instead of mindlessly browsing HN, I&#x27;ll go talk to that cute chick at the end of the bar.&quot; Or even just &quot;I will meditate, I will think about nothing but my breathing while waiting for that coffee.&quot; Though that might be even weirder than playing with your smartphone.
评论 #6451471 未加载
评论 #6451357 未加载
评论 #6452506 未加载
david_otoole超过 11 年前
Careful or you will destroy all the social app crap that makes this website profitable.
normloman超过 11 年前
It&#x27;s not simply that we&#x27;re constantly hunting for information. It&#x27;s that too much information is crap. We use Facebook to find out what our best friend watched on television this week, read some blog about &quot;10 secrets of successful entrepreneurs&quot; (they really aren&#x27;t secret), then head over to our favorite news site to have our political opinions affirmed by pundits.<p>The advertising revenue model gives the media incentives to make lots of cheap, addictive information. They don&#x27;t have an incentive to make quality information. So we get what we pay for.<p>I have vowed to spend less time consuming and more time doing. It&#x27;s hard. I cave in often. But I recommend it.
评论 #6450896 未加载
评论 #6451028 未加载
Eleopteryx超过 11 年前
A few months ago, I had a brief exchange over Twitter with an artist from perhaps my favorite band:<p><a href="https://twitter.com/edwarddroste/status/343418176454926337" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;edwarddroste&#x2F;status&#x2F;343418176454926337</a><p>&quot;Maybe they&#x27;re trying to catch your latest tweet?&quot; was the reply that I wanted to send, but I didn&#x27;t want to come off as cheeky to someone I revered.<p>Is the article not a distraction in itself? Sure enough, I came upon it this morning while I was browsing Twitter from my bed. The article itself is over 2000 words long; some of those words being a transcript from a 15 minute video. Now here I am commenting on it; taking up additional time from my day to formulate these points rather than attending to other things; reinforcing the dissonant relevance and irony of the points that the article is making. This article on distraction is a distraction in itself, and my viewership was predicated on finding it on a distracting service used from a distracting device. I found it and read it because I didn&#x27;t have anything subjectively better to do at the time.<p>I&#x27;m OK with this.
lucaswoj超过 11 年前
This has been on my mind through internships at several major silicon valley social networking companies. There&#x27;s a line of thinking in the industry that, when revenue is driven by ad impressions, driving more interactions with your product is the highest goal. This means two things: getting more users (fine) and driving more interactions per user (dangerous).
krispycement超过 11 年前
Posted the guy on the blog with the RSS, twitter, email links prominently at top right.<p>There is an assumption that those things he laments are functional parts of today&#x27;s and tomorrow&#x27;s world. Maybe he&#x27;s just really boring and people would rather watch a stream of bullshit tweets than discuss the weather with him... because he seems a bit of a malcontent or judgmental.<p>One person&#x27;s distraction is another&#x27;s attention and purpose. It&#x27;s the outsider watching the &#x27;distracted&#x27; trivializing the value of the benefits that the actor is receiving. How smug.<p>Context is everything. Opinions are nothing. Smartphones only fail at optimizing the bandwidth of purposeful living in so much as those information flows have not been built out.<p>If people are anxious about the next packet that comes to them, it might be that they feel unsatisfied with the company and activities before them. People aren&#x27;t being distracted by the devices. They are hunting for higher purpose.
mdup超过 11 年前
The funniest part is that this &quot;culture of distraction&quot; is so neglictible today compared to what it will be in 50 or 100 years.<p>&quot;Remember 2013 when we didn&#x27;t have those lenses showing continuous news feed? When we didn&#x27;t have 360° vision camera wired directly to our brain? Back then our attention span was sooo high&quot;
gz5超过 11 年前
I think our human desire for constant attention, feedback, approval, communication, collaboration, instant satisfaction, etc. has always been there. But now technology has caught up.<p>Perhaps though the pendulum will swing back the other way if technology enables us to get too much instant, constant attention?
评论 #6450536 未加载
评论 #6451384 未加载
评论 #6451058 未加载
j_s超过 11 年前
When &quot;The Net Is a Waste of Time&quot;[1] (an editorial by William Gibson) was discussed[2] on Hacker News:<p><pre><code> &gt; The winning quote: &quot;[sic] surfing the Web is a procrastinator&#x27;s dream. And people &gt; who see you doing it might even imagine you&#x27;re working.&quot; &gt; - https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=5262229 </code></pre> [1] <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1996/07/14/magazine/the-net-is-a-waste-of-time.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;1996&#x2F;07&#x2F;14&#x2F;magazine&#x2F;the-net-is-a-wast...</a><p>[2] <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5261676" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=5261676</a>
darkxanthos超过 11 年前
I&#x27;m not convinced this is new. How would one go about showing that it is?
apostate超过 11 年前
Mindfulness meditation[1] is an old but very effective way of training the mind to recognize distractions. I agree with the article that the opportunities for distraction are at an all-time high, but the human brain has not changed much in the last few millenia, and the problem of being distracted is almost certainly as old as the first time a person desired to contemplate something. To someone who wishes to devote a significant portion of their day to contemplation (e.g. a Buddhist monk), <i>any</i> distraction can be a setback, and the so-called &quot;monkey mind&quot;[2] is awfully persistent.<p>Being able to recognize that you are being pulled away from your object of focus is the essential first step to reduce both the frequency and length of distractions. This is one of the goals of mindfulness meditation. Personally, I have found that the simple act of being able to catch myself in the midst of a distraction has improved my ability to focus.<p>After spending time practicing mindfulness, I have developed a wonderful skill of being able to &quot;switch off&quot; a racing mind and pull myself back down to the task at hand (or to simply pull myself out of an anxious state of mind and into a pleasant one). Importantly, practicing this during 15 minutes of daily meditation has enabled me to do this during any of the other ~1000 waking minutes of each day. The first time I noticed myself do this &quot;automatically&quot; outside of meditation, I was amazed that I was able to cultivate such a skill.<p>If you are interested in a good primer on mindfulness and how to actually go about meditation, I recommend <i>Mindfulness in Plain English</i>.[3] I recommend it whenever the subject comes up and I&#x27;m sure very few people read it, but it had enough of an effect on me that I would not want others to miss out.<p>[1] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindfulness_of_breathing" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Mindfulness_of_breathing</a><p>[2] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind_monkey" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Mind_monkey</a><p>[3] <a href="http://www.urbandharma.org/pdf/mindfulness_in_plain_english.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.urbandharma.org&#x2F;pdf&#x2F;mindfulness_in_plain_english....</a>
评论 #6452160 未加载
adamconroy超过 11 年前
Is it that much different to reading a newspaper&#x2F;mag&#x2F;book or watching the shop&#x27;s TV while waiting for fish and chips?<p>I&#x27;m the first to be pissed when people I&#x27;m hanging out with start fiddling with their phone but I&#x27;m also the first to fiddle with my phone if I have a spare minute waiting for something and there is nobody to offend.<p>When going out to dinner or a bar, I like the idea of everyone stacking their phones on the table. Everyone time someone can&#x27;t resist touching their phone they have to shout a round of drinks.
crux超过 11 年前
There&#x27;s nothing really new in this talk but I have to say it was well-delivered. Well enough that I want to really resolve to keep my phone in my pocket whenever I&#x27;m with someone - even if they get up from the table. It&#x27;s of course unconscionable to start tapping around while you&#x27;re in the middle of a conversation, but I&#x27;m very well-acquainted with the impulse to check facebook or email as soon as a friend goes to the bathroom. I&#x27;ll really try to capture that valuable mind-wandering time.
评论 #6452261 未加载
tekalon超过 11 年前
Distracted from what? If we&#x27;re distracted from socialization, its probably that whoever we&#x27;re socializing isn&#x27;t that interesting. No longer thinking&#x2F;pondering? I use those mindless games to &#x27;ponder&#x27;- They are simple enough it doesn&#x27;t take much mental process to play, but leaves enough for me to think about what needs to be thought out (problems, the day, world problems, etc). The same arguments he&#x27;s made have been made about books for centuries.
jawr超过 11 年前
I just wanted to say that Joe Kraus did an awesome job at keeping my attention and presenting his ideas. It is extremely odd how much people rely on phones, but I think it&#x27;s deeper that that and it&#x27;s actually the internet that is the fundamental issue. Yes, it&#x27;s a great resource; it&#x27;s a great source of entertainment, knowledge and potential power. But for something that could be described as intangible it seems to be quite detrimental to us as a society.
queeerkopf超过 11 年前
earlier discussion on HN: <a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4710217" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=4710217</a>
zwieback超过 11 年前
I&#x27;m sure there&#x27;s some danger in all this distraction but I also think that people really weren&#x27;t that interesting and interested before smartphones. Smart and creative people will always find ways to do smart and creative things but lots of people just look for distraction in whatever form they can find.<p>The point about kids is an important one, though. Smartphone-parents do set a bad example for their kids.
joshdance超过 11 年前
You can&#x27;t blame a &quot;smartphone&quot; for the distraction. It is merely a tool. People don&#x27;t like to think or create, they like to consume. The smartphone is the best tool for consumption. I try to chose when I want to interact with my phone. Sometimes that means ignoring texts or calls, and turning off notifications. Not perfect but it is a start.
floobynewb超过 11 年前
I experience this. But my addiction is for information, technical articles, scientific papers in mathematics, physics, machine learning, biology. Now I can do it all on my phone anywhere, anytime. Texting and social media are of little interest to me... Do you think this is still something I should worry about?
Millennium超过 11 年前
What is this &quot;are creating&quot;? We&#x27;ve had one for decades. We&#x27;ve refined it tremendously over the last 50+ years, by taking advantage of new technological achievements, but the fundamentals have been in place a lot longer than the article&#x27;s author seems to think.
评论 #6451897 未加载
DougN7超过 11 年前
This resonates so much with me and my kids. On Saturday when school is out, they&#x27;ll spend 80+% of their day engaging with one screen or another. And during my non-work time, blogs and forums (ahem), online news and magazines are where I end up spending a lot of time...
评论 #6450973 未加载
diydsp超过 11 年前
interesting point about the notifications from cellphones being random (and thus addictive like gambling). Perhaps mine would be less random if I were to use the &quot;different sounds for different people&quot; feature...
dnautics超过 11 年前
to play devil&#x27;s advocate (I don&#x27;t necessarily believe this; I just don&#x27;t know) - why is this necessarily a problem? For example, one possibility is: Over time, an increased culture of distraction will through social selection filter itself out into &quot;improved multitasking ability&quot;. There are always growing pains associated with any seismic shift in society, especially those created by technology. What makes this one different, or are you someone who laments that time given over to learn cursive is now used to teach children to type?
qwerta超过 11 年前
Phone can be switched off. The real problem are open-plane offices.
评论 #6451236 未加载
评论 #6451047 未加载
avodonosov超过 11 年前
Fully agree with the title. But haven&#x27;t read fully - too many characters, don&#x27;t want to distract that much from the current tasks :)
mathattack超过 11 年前
I hope the irony of this story being posted on Hacker News isn&#x27;t lost on everyone. :-)
noptic超过 11 年前
TL;Look a cat!!!
dpweb超过 11 年前
More first world problems..
drewsears超过 11 年前
tl;dr
contextual超过 11 年前
This is why I walk. I don&#x27;t drive, or even have a car. I do my best thinking when I walk and my mind is free to roam. VOW of NOW[1], Summon the Warrior[2] and my upcoming Self Experiments[3] are all products of walking and gap time.<p>Not only does walking spark creativity, but I&#x27;ve met a lot of new people this way.<p>[1] <a href="http://vowofnow.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;vowofnow.com</a> [2] <a href="http://summonthewarrior.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;summonthewarrior.com</a> [3] <a href="http://selfexperiments.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;selfexperiments.com</a>
评论 #6450081 未加载
评论 #6450036 未加载
diminoten超过 11 年前
Distraction and technology are related, insofar that technology <i>allows</i> for distraction, but it does not mandate it.<p>The mistaken assumption is that a person must be &quot;distracted&quot; by one&#x27;s phone, when that may not be the case at all. Since when was reading a magazine being &quot;distracted&quot;, or reading a book being &quot;distracted&quot;? Why is playing a video game considered a distraction?<p>The facts presented in this article, and the conclusions drawn by this article are orthogonal. Yes, we&#x27;re bad at multitasking, and yes, people out in the world are buried in their phones more and more, but the connection between multitasking and looking at my phone isn&#x27;t there.<p>Besides, why do I have to be particularly <i>good</i> when I&#x27;m playing Angry Birds or reading HN? I don&#x27;t care if I&#x27;m performing 10 IQ points or 40% worse than if I were checking my text messages in a park by myself.<p>The article makes another false assumption that we must always be at our best whenever we do something, which is <i>also</i> untrue. Sure, I could use my slow, deliberate mental system to make all my choices, and I&#x27;d be immensely slow but very accurate. Or, I could use my fast, intuitive mental system to make quick, if less accurate decisions that <i>usually</i> get me where I want to be, or in a position I want to be in. I don&#x27;t need to use my whole brain to hold a conversation with a friend, and I don&#x27;t need to use my whole brain to wait in line for fish and chips.<p>There is an anxiety towards seemingly doing nothing, and it&#x27;s well founded. The author talks about anxiety like it&#x27;s the enemy, when in reality it&#x27;s a necessary motivator.
jackmaney超过 11 年前
Hmmm, this appears to be an insightful article. I think I&#x27;ll read it thoro--oooh, coffee&#x27;s done!
评论 #6450799 未加载
doubt_me超过 11 年前
This is one of the major problems pointed out in Noam Chomskys manufacturing of consent (1992). Its a really nice documentary. I think the entire thing is uploaded to youtube