TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Academia.edu, The Social Networking Platform For Researchers, Raises $11 Million

66 点作者 RichardPrice超过 11 年前

8 条评论

linhat超过 11 年前
So, is anybody here <i>actually</i> active on academia.edu? Asking, since as a computer vision researcher (3D reconstruction, obstacle recognition&#x2F;identification, augmented reality, ...) I am constantly looking for scientific resources, and to be frank, it is quite annoying because it can become really time consuming.<p>So a genuine question, is the site worth signing up for? I remember when mendeley just started, there was lots of excitement about it, mainly because it was sort of marketed as <i>the last.fm of research</i> (giving you <i>good</i> recommendations for <i>your</i> scientific interests), but then it turned out to be just <i>meeh</i> (getting bought by Elsevier didn&#x27;t help much ;-).<p>Also, on a side note, are there any other good sites doing something similar out there (like a reddit&#x2F;HN for <i>insert your research interests here</i> type of site) that are actually any good? I&#x27;m sure there must be a lot of other researchers active on HN...
评论 #6454354 未加载
评论 #6453963 未加载
评论 #6453769 未加载
thelettere超过 11 年前
Still kind of shitty - you have to log in to view or download anything. Google scholar is much more useful and open.
评论 #6453190 未加载
评论 #6453709 未加载
taariqlewis超过 11 年前
It&#x27;s all fun and games until we someone asks what&#x27;s the DAU&#x2F;MAU on that puppy. How many of those are actually active and what are they actually doing when they login.
评论 #6452638 未加载
评论 #6452696 未加载
diminoten超过 11 年前
How did it get a .edu domain? Is it an accredited institution?
评论 #6452867 未加载
评论 #6453697 未加载
评论 #6453706 未加载
jgamman超过 11 年前
after Mendeley I&#x27;m not going anywhere near something like this. and seriously, isn&#x27;t the web itself the best publishing mechanism ever invented? why are we trying to fit everything into a single service provider model? academic makes webpage using awful html and notepad with copies of their articles. other researchers track the people they&#x27;re interested in. RSS? not my !@##@ problem, use a site checker plug-in. it&#x27;s free, extendable and has no lock-in risks. the root cause problem here is academic promotion incentives almost force you into publishing behind paywalls.
fluidcruft超过 11 年前
How does this compare to researchgate? I know lots of people that use researchgate.net, but nobody I know uses academia.edu.
cantastoria超过 11 年前
I&#x27;d love to see their business plan.<p>Academics on the whole are not a good demo for advertising and don&#x27;t want to pay for anything related to their jobs&#x2F;research unless they have absolutely no other choice. How are they going to make money? I can&#x27;t even see them being a good acquisition.
评论 #6455833 未加载
mbq超过 11 年前
IMO the only useful thing about A.edu is that they have a good position in search engines and give you an information about clicks -- so it&#x27;s like Google Analytics for your papers and profile. The rest is sadly either cumbersome or redundant.