What's best? low-fat diet? low-carb diet? vegetarian diet? the answer.

By reading the opening, the closing, and skimming the rest, you will see that it has a fair bit of useful and accurate content, just very spread out.<p>And just as the article points out, it gave away its whole article with the words "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants."

Pollan's latest book, <i>The Omnivore's Dilemma</i>, is worth reading. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Omnivores-Dilemma-Natural-History-Meals/dp/0143038583/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-3946590-2838560?ie=UTF8&#38;s=books&#38;qid=1191881143&#38;sr=8-1" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Omnivores-Dilemma-Natural-History-Meal...</a><p>The overall organization is little forced at times, but the research for each section is really interesting.

Hunger is not arbitrary. The nervous system tells you what to eat. If you stay with substances that were around during humanity's long evolutionary period, you'll do fine: Meat, vegetables, fruits. If you spend more than 10 minutes worrying over it, you've already lost.

Was this a different link earlier? I read this article a while ago (and liked it a lot). But the link I read from this post earlier today was about the coolness of the Atkins diet and was not nearly as good. Whappen?

The Hacker's Diet is an interesting approach to weight loss.<p><a href="http://www.fourmilab.ch/hackdiet/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fourmilab.ch/hackdiet/</a>

Looks like a very long article with very little content.