TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Chimps choose more rationally than humans

7 点作者 garbowza超过 17 年前

2 条评论

nextmoveone超过 17 年前
I may be wrong here but...<p>I dont think chimpanzees have a firm grasp on economics or even an analogous example; chimps don't think about spending banana's to make more bananas in the long run. Chimps arent thinking about trading banana's for shelter or safety or manual labor.<p>"In the game, a human or chimpanzee who receives something of value can offer to share it with another."<p>Also, from what I gathered from that article the people and chimps have to work to get something, then they can choose to share it. Why would they share? Person or Chimp? That would be real self-interest.<p>I mean if you are forced to make an offer and you know your counterpart is not as smart as you...let's say a chimp, you would be dumb not to offer less. <p>That's just my two cents.
评论 #65617 未加载
Retric超过 17 年前
That depends on the number of rounds. Granted with one round you should accept anything. But, if you have more than one you can set a minimum bound and punish people who give you low bids.<p>AKA Round 1 accept 10% Round 2-100 accept 1%? vs. Round 1 reject 10% Round 2 reject 25% Round 3 reject 40% Round 4-100 accept 50%