TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

If you use Google+, you could become an ad next month

264 点作者 hypr_geek超过 11 年前

35 条评论

Alterlife超过 11 年前
This actually doesn&#x27;t seem terrible to me: If I published a public review on a product, why should Google not auto-match this up to a search result?<p>That&#x27;s the logical next step. It&#x27;s what I&#x27;d expect from Google. I don&#x27;t see anything privacy breaking about it of it&#x27;s own...<p>As long as the review was public, ofcourse -- or only being shown to those it was published to.<p>That said, I just went ahead and opted-out of it because I don&#x27;t know if it means what I think it means... and I don&#x27;t want Google publishing things that I didn&#x27;t say.
评论 #6535375 未加载
评论 #6534660 未加载
评论 #6535224 未加载
评论 #6535747 未加载
评论 #6535826 未加载
haberman超过 11 年前
So you write a public review of a business, and then you&#x27;re upset because Google shows people that review?<p>I really don&#x27;t get it. What if your review was the first search result instead? Isn&#x27;t that the same thing?<p>If I search for a product on Amazon, it shows me the number of stars for each product, and if I click on that it shows me excerpts of different people&#x27;s reviews. How is that any different? <a href="http://imgur.com/7FC2jfx" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;imgur.com&#x2F;7FC2jfx</a>
评论 #6536758 未加载
评论 #6537548 未加载
评论 #6537016 未加载
评论 #6536279 未加载
评论 #6536966 未加载
评论 #6538264 未加载
评论 #6538610 未加载
geerlingguy超过 11 年前
Disappointing.<p>Facebook&#x27;s decision to use people in their ads, and also automatically subscribe people to spam from Facebook Pages, has already made clicking the Like button a &#x27;heavy&#x27; action—meaning I have to think about it before doing it, and most likely won&#x27;t click nowadays.<p>Google Plus is the same now. I used to consider handing out a quick +1 to any post I liked, or a cool site&#x2F;service. But now, I have to think about whether I would be okay with my profile being associated with whatever that article&#x2F;site&#x2F;service is doing, and whatever they may do in the future.<p>I&#x27;ve already opted out, but I&#x27;ve now lost my trust that clicking +1 is a lightweight&#x2F;safe action.<p>The only social button&#x2F;action that seems safe anymore is the &#x27;Tweet this&#x27; button... Hopefully Twitter doesn&#x27;t screw <i>that</i> up.
评论 #6535135 未加载
评论 #6534898 未加载
评论 #6535433 未加载
评论 #6534670 未加载
magicalist超过 11 年前
I am not really a fan of this (though it seems like not that different than what the review was meant for in the first place (unlike, say, construing a like on facebook as an endorsement of that thing), but complete lack of interest in associating myself with reviews of a company or product is why I don&#x27;t write reviews with my G+ account in the first place), but I am a fan of publishing a diff of Terms of Service changes, especially with a nice plain-English summary at the top.<p>Of course, without this coverage, I don&#x27;t know how the vast majority of people would have come across this page[1]. I don&#x27;t appear to have been notified in my gmail account. To be fair, though, I&#x27;ve grown to hate the near constant ToS change emails I get from paypal, so there&#x27;s some balance to be struck there too).<p>edit: actually, I take back my last point. I get a big blue bar on top of google.com notifying me of the change, and it&#x27;s not even a &quot;click here to see a ToS change&quot; that I would never be interested in enough to click on, it&#x27;s &quot;Our new Terms of Service update how we display your information in content &amp; ads.&quot; with a &quot;Learn more&quot; link. Still wouldn&#x27;t want to be involved with the feature, but good for them for handling it like that.<p>[1] <a href="http://www.google.com/policies/terms/changes/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;policies&#x2F;terms&#x2F;changes&#x2F;</a>
评论 #6535073 未加载
rocky1138超过 11 年前
Why would someone write a review for something but then not expect to have that review used by the business to further their sales?
评论 #6534530 未加载
评论 #6535547 未加载
ToastyMallows超过 11 年前
Opt out link for the lazy: <a href="https://plus.google.com/settings/endorsements" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;plus.google.com&#x2F;settings&#x2F;endorsements</a>
评论 #6535288 未加载
评论 #6534505 未加载
spindritf超过 11 年前
I seem to have opted my whole domain (Google Apps) out somehow<p>&gt; Based on your domain&#x27;s current settings, your name and profile picture will not appear in shared endorsements paired with ads. If your domain administrator changes this in the future, your choice here will be honored.<p><a href="https://plus.google.com/settings/endorsements?hl=en" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;plus.google.com&#x2F;settings&#x2F;endorsements?hl=en</a><p>though I don&#x27;t know exactly how. Anybody knows which domain-wide setting is responsible?
评论 #6534540 未加载
Ygg2超过 11 年前
Am I the only one that sees the comedic potential in this?<p>Rate something 5&#x2F;5. For example for a review of a restauraunt say &quot;5&#x2F;5. Sure beats eating rats infected with syphilis.&quot; or &quot;4&#x2F;5. Tastes like leprosy! Smells like porn locker!&quot;<p>And I&#x27;m just being very bad here: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Avoid-Huge-Ships-John-Trimmer/dp/0870334336" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;Avoid-Huge-Ships-John-Trimmer&#x2F;dp&#x2F;08703...</a>
评论 #6535519 未加载
nilkn超过 11 年前
People are slowly leaving Facebook as they seek out more privacy control. Obviously Facebook still dominates the world of social networks, but there&#x27;s a lot of friction involved in this aspect of it.<p>So what does Google decide to do? They decide to follow in the footsteps of Facebook and replicate all the same privacy problems, so not only are people going to leave G+ due to changes like this, but people aren&#x27;t even going to be compelled to sign up unless more or less forced to do so.<p>This is not innovation. It&#x27;s repeating the mistakes of others in exchange for a quick short-term profit.
评论 #6535632 未加载
评论 #6536357 未加载
PeterisP超过 11 年前
Can I easily delete my Google+ account w&#x2F;o hampering my Gmail&#x2F;calendar&#x2F;etc? I made it once but I see only drawbacks in having it.<p>I&#x27;m already fed up with the repeated requests to merge my Youtube &#x27;channel&#x27; (wtf? I don&#x27;t have or want a channel, I&#x27;ve made &lt;10 comments on youtube and that&#x27;s it) with my Google+ pic&#x2F;name, and I definitely don&#x27;t ever want to do that - but there&#x27;s a risk that at some time I&#x27;ll accidentally misclick one of their prompts.<p>[edit] For example, I&#x27;m worried about their warning on Google+ deletion page &#x27;You won&#x27;t be able to use the &quot;Sign in with Google&quot; button to log in to third-party apps.&#x27;, since I have used google-signin in some apps (IIRC that was even before google+ was a thing), and that would mean these apps becoming inaccessible.
评论 #6535306 未加载
评论 #6536702 未加载
评论 #6535289 未加载
akurilin超过 11 年前
Can someone tell me if it&#x27;s possible to nuke a Google+ account and still keep all of the data in the other services, such as Picasa (now named Google Photos), Docs, Gmail etc? I really want to delete my G+ account, but I&#x27;m concerned it will inadvertently nuke something else I&#x27;m counting on.
评论 #6536672 未加载
sologoub超过 11 年前
Just opted out and got this confirmation message:<p>&quot;Are you sure? When you disable this setting, your friends will be less likely to benefit from your recommendations.&quot;<p>Seriously?
评论 #6536226 未加载
millstone超过 11 年前
I attempted to understand what exactly this change means, but I could not. I then attempted to opt out, but I could not; I don&#x27;t know if that means I am opted out or not. As a result I mistrust this change.<p>I saw the banner on the top of the Search page, linking to the new ToS. Here is what it says:<p><i>your friends, family and others may see your Profile name and photo, and content like the reviews you share or the ads you +1’d. This only happens when you take an action (things like +1’ing, commenting or following) – and the only people who see it are the people you’ve chosen to share that content with.</i><p>I don&#x27;t understand what this means. A possible reading is that if I comment in a blog, Google might take a snippet from my comment, associate it with the profile picture it chose for me (which is a nonsense screencap from a YouTube video I uploaded five years ago), and then show it to people it has determined to be my friends, perhaps in the way that Google Buzz determined that my Realtor was my friend.<p>I don&#x27;t know which pages this applies to: all of the Internet, Google properties, or Google+ pages only. Even if it&#x27;s Google+, I fear that services like Blogger will get assimilated into Google+, and then my comments there will become fair game. I also don&#x27;t know what &quot;take an action&quot; means. I fear that &quot;take an action&quot; includes &quot;send an email&quot; and that content from my messages will be showing up in the recipients&#x27; ads.<p>I want to opt-out. I clicked on the &quot;Shared Endorsement Settings&quot;, but instead of giving me a way to opt out, I am encouraged to &quot;Join Google+&quot; in which my real name will be used &quot;across all Google products.&quot; I don&#x27;t understand if this means I am already opted out because I don&#x27;t have a Google+ account, or if I need to make such an account to opt-out. I am reminded of the noxious YouTube popup, where in order to watch that cat video I have to convince Google to not use my real name, in whatever unspecified way.<p>Google&#x27;s properties make me feel like I am Indiana Jones in the Name of God trap. I am forever one misclick away from irrevocably exposing my personal information.
评论 #6536214 未加载
Tloewald超过 11 年前
It would be fun to mess with Google&#x27;s algoritms -- +1 this product is amazing -- the rats in my apartment are now twice as big, considerably more numerous, and openly aggressive.
herbig超过 11 年前
So if I&#x27;ve deleted the Google plus service from my Google account, I have nothing to worry about?
评论 #6534631 未加载
richardw超过 11 年前
I&#x27;ve always been the biggest Google fanboy but I&#x27;ve had it with their creep towards maximum value extraction while pruning useful services that don&#x27;t support the stock price. Consider my opting out a tiny protest.
acheron超过 11 年前
Headline should read &quot;If you use Google+&quot;, yes? No other Google services are affected that I understand. Frankly, at this point if you use Google+ you deserve what you get.
zgohr超过 11 年前
The concern, at least for me, is not that a &quot;public&quot; review being used in a &quot;public&quot; way, it&#x27;s that these businesses are now paying Google for my review and I get no cut. When I wrote this review I didn&#x27;t write it to help this business out, per se, I wrote it because I wanted to help potential consumers decide where to do business based on my experiences.
评论 #6535155 未加载
评论 #6534965 未加载
belorn超过 11 年前
This will give everyone a useful tool to grief companies for using google ads. Just pick a obscene picture, and write obscene &quot;review&quot; for that product (maybe even rate it 5 stars to encourage google to use your review), and instant have the world see your profanity associated with that brand.<p>Can&#x27;t possible see how this couldn&#x27;t backfire for google.
macspoofing超过 11 年前
Shouldn&#x27;t G+ users be paid for this?
评论 #6535927 未加载
10098超过 11 年前
The truth is the link to profile may only appear if you&#x27;ve written A PUBLICLY VISIBLE REVIEW of the business. If the author of this shitty article bothered even a little with some research, he&#x27;d find it out. But the truth doesn&#x27;t make for a loud linkbaity title.
benologist超过 11 年前
Summary spam - <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/12/technology/google-sets-plan-to-sell-users-endorsements.html?_r=2&amp;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2013&#x2F;10&#x2F;12&#x2F;technology&#x2F;google-sets-pla...</a>
jinx_xnij超过 11 年前
You have to opt in, in order for Google to start using your name. If you do not want this to happen, you are all set. (That is, unless prior settings i had in google pre-selected the option to not let Google use my name in their ads)
techaddict009超过 11 年前
<a href="https://plus.google.com/settings/endorsements?hl=en" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;plus.google.com&#x2F;settings&#x2F;endorsements?hl=en</a> visit here and disable it simple !
crystaln超过 11 年前
So, the expectation when you write a positive review on a Google service is that the review will not be displayed as an endorsement of the product?<p>Isn&#x27;t that the entire point of writing the review?
评论 #6536864 未加载
Zenst超过 11 年前
Can imagine many people wiull get overly creative with there profile pictures.<p>But in fairness the choice is by default disabled so you would have to enable it - as it stands today.
csdreamer7超过 11 年前
I had a Google+ account but then I deleted it. Now that link to opt out of the face endorsement is telling me I have to setup a G+ account to be able to set it.
greglindahl超过 11 年前
Why, your friend John Doe searched for [jock itch] just last week! And he bought Gold Bond(tm)!<p>The TOS says &quot;Actions you take on Google&quot;. Heh.
blueblob超过 11 年前
Do you guys think I should remove my reviews of all of the adult toys that I own?
评论 #6535866 未加载
评论 #6535335 未加载
maxk42超过 11 年前
I&#x27;d be fine with this as long as it was opt-in rather than opt-out.<p>Bad move, Google.
mpg33超过 11 年前
Are we getting a cut of the ad revenue if we are endorsing it? ;)
nfm超过 11 年前
This appears to be opt-<i>in</i> for Google Apps accounts.
crazychrome超过 11 年前
can someone create a f*ckgoogle.com so that i can +1?
witty_username超过 11 年前
exaggerated title IMO
001sky超过 11 年前
<i>Don&#x27;t be evil</i><p>Oh, wait its 2013...<p>carry on