TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: What are the essential books of knowledge for civilization?

7 点作者 iand超过 11 年前
I saw a reference in another HN post to "507 Movements", a classic textbook on mechanisms, and it set me wondering what books would be most useful to rebuild the world in the event of a collapse of society. I'm thinking of definitive books on agriculture, engineering, metallurgy, etc. What would be your choice of books that could be used to learn the fundamentals of civilization?

6 条评论

EdwardCoffin超过 11 年前
There used to be a website called Canonical Tomes, which provided a way for people to propose and vote on the most essential books on various topics. It&#x27;s been gone for a long time now, but you can browse through it on archive.org here: <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20010616232238/http://www.canonicaltomes.org/index.cgi" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20010616232238&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.canonic...</a> . You might find some useful stuff there.
fractallyte超过 11 年前
As well as definitive books, you need a carefully graded way of proceeding through them - plus a very good index. As David Palmer pointed out in his novel <i>Emergence</i>, one would have to devise a &#x27;system to locate specifics in such huge collection. Useless otherwise; researcher could spend most of life looking for data instead of using.&#x27;<p>Other critical books should include philosophy and science: it took a <i>long</i> time to build a technological civilization, and the Scientific Method is the cornerstone of this. (And yet even now, much of the world is still mired superstition&#x2F;religion.)<p>More crucial lessons from John Wyndham&#x27;s <i>The Day of the Triffids</i>: &#x27;The most valuable part of our flying start is knowledge. That&#x27;s the short cut to save us starting where our ancestors did. We&#x27;ve got it all there in books if we take the trouble to find out about it...<p>&#x27;From my reading of history, the thing you have to have to use knowledge is leisure. Where <i>everybody</i> has to work hard just to get a living and there is no leisure to think, knowledge stagnates, and people with it. The thinking has to be done largely by people who are not directly productive - by people who appear to be living almost entirely on the work of others, but are, in fact, a long-term investment. Learning grew up in the cities and in great institutions - it was the labour of the countryside that supported them...<p>&#x27;A community of our present size cannot hope to do more than exist and decline. If we stay here as we are, just ten of us now, the end is, quite inevitably, a gradual and useless fade-out. If there are children we shall be able to spare only enough time from our labour to give them just a rudimentary education; on generation further, and we shall have savages or clods. To hold our own, to make any use of all the knowledge in the libraries we must have the teacher, the doctor, and the leader, and we must be able to support them while they help us.&#x27;
BWStearns超过 11 年前
I know that conflict is the less civilized side of civilization, and that HN generally is opposed to it (as sane people are), but a discussion of societal development would be lacking without an honest consideration of where the civilized components break down.<p>I would suggest Musashi (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Book_of_Five_Rings" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Book_of_Five_Rings</a>), Clausewitz, Influence of Seapower Upon History (Mahan), and of course Sun Tzu. While some are more specific than others (Musashi is actually about swordsmanship specifically, but conflict generally) they all have insightful things to teach.<p>For a broader discussion look at Bobbitt&#x27;s Shield of Achilles. He still has a significant portion on conflict, however it is also a discussion on the interplay of technology, legal development, and conflict.
nyan_sandwich超过 11 年前
On the cause and mitigation of collapses, my humble opinion is that a culture of technical ambition and inquiry is likely to be as important as specific knowledge.<p>You might want to look at what kinds of people (culturally and ethnically) are behind most innovation and engineering, and look at the differences and influences there. (It may be interesting to look at the historical trend of their power, as well, for futurological purposes.) If the culture that produces civilization stays around through a collapse, there probably is less to worry about than if that culture doesn&#x27;t survive.<p>Thus among your important books may be some of the books of industrial <i>culture</i>, like Atlas Shrugged, most good science fiction, some enlightenment philosophy and poetry, Paul Graham&#x27;s writing, etc.
a3n超过 11 年前
Great question. I suspect that any references would not be immediately useful. The collapse would be slow and chaotic, we&#x27;d probably go through something like the dark ages, and then rebuild partly on salvaged historical references and mostly on immediate need and ingenuity.
评论 #6557960 未加载
makerops超过 11 年前
Not a book, but a good addition:<p><a href="http://opensourceecology.org/gvcs.php" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;opensourceecology.org&#x2F;gvcs.php</a>
评论 #6555575 未加载