TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Robots With Automatic Rifles Could Be on the Battlefield in 5 Years

20 点作者 robabbott超过 11 年前

11 条评论

protomyth超过 11 年前
Other than keeping our casualties down, this actually might stop some civilian casualties. Since the operator of the gun is not in mortal danger, s/he can pause that briefest of moments to decide if the person s/he is shooting at should be shot.
评论 #6577766 未加载
评论 #6577627 未加载
评论 #6577647 未加载
评论 #6578347 未加载
评论 #6577708 未加载
评论 #6577832 未加载
terabytest超过 11 年前
The prospect of an entirely robotic war is interesting to me. No more bloodshed, the winner is determined by the amount of technological progress they manage to achieve and put into use. Wars could actually become somewhat useful for humanity as means to improve technologies (they already do, but the death toll that comes with them is kind of a shitty side-effect).
评论 #6578115 未加载
评论 #6578054 未加载
评论 #6580048 未加载
评论 #6578175 未加载
nostromo超过 11 年前
I&#x27;m surprised they didn&#x27;t mention ATLAS. <a href="http://www.theroboticschallenge.org/aboutrobots.aspx" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theroboticschallenge.org&#x2F;aboutrobots.aspx</a><p>It looks so much like the terminator I wonder if it&#x27;s a coincidence.
评论 #6578135 未加载
kiddz超过 11 年前
Fantasy talk for a second. . . ok, so if robots have far greater accuracy and of course options for self-exposure within a battlefield, why can&#x27;t their primary directive be to shoot (literally) the guns of the enemy. It would be great if the technology was directed in a way for the robots not be &quot;killer&quot; but rather to shoot at the actual weapon someone is holding and not their person.
评论 #6578125 未加载
melling超过 11 年前
I&#x27;d settle for a really good vacuum cleaner. I&#x27;ve been holding out for years now. Shouldn&#x27;t that problem be easier to solve? Killer robots always garner headlines but there are a still a few practical robots away from the real revolution. The real revolution happens once consumers enter the picture.
评论 #6578184 未加载
jotm超过 11 年前
I think the major concerns with &quot;infantry drones&quot; are signal hijacking&#x2F;jamming and physical tampering - the latter could be remedied with a well designed body, as well as a fast self-defense system (a gun or at least a high power laser to quickly disable any approaching enemies)...
评论 #6578028 未加载
scotty79超过 11 年前
Shouln&#x27;t military throw a tanker of money at computer vision researchers right about now?
评论 #6577744 未加载
qwerta超过 11 年前
I hope this will finally make farad (or even kilofarad) capacitors cheap and available. There is no better engine for innovation than arms race.
oscargrouch超过 11 年前
- General, Im proud to announce that after decades of research of our brightest scientists our country can make robots!<p>- Great, now its just put a gun in their hands and teach them how to kill!<p>Total failure of the human kind: Technologically advanced morally corrupt
busterarm超过 11 年前
DISASSEMBLE? NO DISASSEMBLE!!!<p>YOUR MOTHER WAS A SNOW-BLOWER!
wyager超过 11 年前
Because a robot with an automatic rifle is way scarier than a robot with a semi-automatic rifle.
评论 #6577658 未加载
评论 #6577732 未加载
评论 #6577685 未加载