TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Why all OVH dedicated servers are "sold out"

57 点作者 mike_esspe超过 11 年前

13 条评论

bio4m超过 11 年前
The biggest problem was they were introducing new servers with similar or better specs than servers existing customers had. And instead of dropping existing customers prices, they kept them static. So a lot of people found themselves looking at a bill 600% higher for the same server just because they were an existing customer. Who in their right mind would pay 6x times more for the same service ?<p>They could stop the customer churn by simply changing the price to match the new offerings.<p>At the time I switched to a new server type I even asked their customer team if the new pricing would be offered to existing customers and the answer was a flat no.
davidjgraph超过 11 年前
How about simply reduce the rental cost of the older servers to below that of the newer servers? I don&#x27;t see this mentioned anywhere, isn&#x27;t it pretty obvious?
评论 #6579681 未加载
评论 #6579930 未加载
评论 #6579689 未加载
评论 #6579670 未加载
评论 #6579721 未加载
评论 #6580329 未加载
评论 #6580079 未加载
dcc1超过 11 年前
I cancelled all my OVH servers, on the high end they are a ripoff and their internal network went to crap recently, it was faster to move files to another country than between 2 HG XXXL servers, go figure<p>I am currently testing the waters on offering 24 and 36 drive storage monsters <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6576796" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=6576796</a><p>any feedback is appreciated
评论 #6579683 未加载
jjoe超过 11 年前
&quot;bringing in new customers and new projects which will <i>allow us to increase our business figures</i>&quot;<p>Guys, you need to realize this isn&#x27;t about getting the balance sheet in the black. There is no legitimate or interesting problem to solve here. They&#x27;ve been deep in the red. Their ultimate goal is to increase revenue figures at <i>all cost</i> and perhaps look &quot;good&quot; for an OK exit. Maybe there isn&#x27;t more users or market share to grab in their niche. Hence the &quot;thrashing.&quot; Their target server count is a million. They&#x27;ve been building DCs left and right with this figure in mind without there being solid sustained demand. I think they&#x27;ve spread themselves too thin.<p>OVH is working hard to acquire as many users as it can for the sole purpose of pleasing investors. And when that becomes any business&#x27; only focus...
sriramiyer超过 11 年前
I too, like many of you find their policies a little strange. Where the entire business world practices reducing prices of older products and replacing them with superior products at old or even slightly <i>higher</i> price points one must wonder the reasoning behind their, &quot;newer must be cheaper than older&quot; strategy where they do not pass on the benefit of the older hardware to the customers.<p>If an existing customer reads that page, and this thread there&#x27;s just one thing that they will immediately deduce. Existing customers are being used as a subsidizing agent to capture new audience. Which, again is quite strange. In a game theoretic way, this drives the point to existing customers that it is beneficial to not be loyal to the service (i.e. cancel&#x2F;re-order).<p>If they reduced cost on older hardware while introducing newer one, they could also list those up for sale. Surely people on a budget or people who don&#x27;t need a Xeon will simply settle for an <i>older</i> Atom at a cheaper price. This also allows OVH to retain and milk the box till its ROI is hopefully achieved.
clienthunter超过 11 年前
I&#x27;m an OVH customer, and I find this unbelievably bad practice. This rant is a piece of polemic that only serves to legitimise <i>their</i> screw up. Not selling cheap dedi&#x27;s makes them entirely redundant.
评论 #6579652 未加载
评论 #6580109 未加载
评论 #6579630 未加载
yannickmahe超过 11 年前
CEO announced on twitter they would have new offers in 10-14 days.<p><a href="https://twitter.com/olesovhcom/status/390557634790973440" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;olesovhcom&#x2F;status&#x2F;390557634790973440</a>
benmorris超过 11 年前
It appears to me they have underpriced their servers to the point they can&#x27;t offset the ratio of existing customers upgrading servers. Seems like they should implement longer term contracts if they want to keep offering these rock bottom prices people keep snatching up. I&#x27;ll admit looking at their pricing I can see why they sell so many.
nly超过 11 年前
Despite other criticisms, you can pry my $60&#x2F;year dedi out of my cold dead hands (2 GiB&#x2F;500GB&#x2F;dual core Atom)
评论 #6579860 未加载
networked超过 11 年前
&gt;The main competitor of OVH is actually OVH itself. The customer stays with OVH but orders a new server instead of keeping the old one.<p>Interesting problem, and surely not the worst one to have. What would have been a more graceful way to deal with it, though, if any?
评论 #6580180 未加载
alexandros超过 11 年前
Surely if users are flocking to the &#x27;latest and greatest&#x27; you deal with that by gradually reducing the prices of the old servers such that you get natural price discrimination?
评论 #6579701 未加载
lowry超过 11 年前
it would be much better for their sales if they did not force clients to manually renew every 3 months.
评论 #6580066 未加载
评论 #6580310 未加载
Napapijri超过 11 年前
OVH is the worst out there.