TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Argument Machine

23 点作者 __chrismc超过 11 年前

8 条评论

jcutrell超过 11 年前
There&#x27;s a lot of this that I agree with, but there&#x27;s also a lot of it that is limited by personal experience. I for one have never had a fight on Twitter - the closest thing being when I complained about my poor Comcast service - so I can&#x27;t say I resonate with all of these things.<p>However, something that should be pointed out: brevity is not inherently the cause for misunderstanding. Brevity is a constraint. Don&#x27;t try to say hard things in fewer words if you don&#x27;t understand wit. And, perhaps as importantly, don&#x27;t say witty things who don&#x27;t understand them. This is a lesson every good marketing class will teach you, and Ogilvy preached:<p>&quot;Our business is infested with idiots who try to impress by using pretentious jargon.&quot;<p>But, I suppose when you force the masses to be brief, they won&#x27;t think of Ogilvy.
评论 #6628037 未加载
petercooper超过 11 年前
I think a lot of the antagonism you <i>see</i> from certain open source communities comes from Twitter nowadays. (That is, angry debates exist everywhere, but it leaks out of Twitter better than someone going crazy in an IRC channel.)<p>Ten years ago, you had to write a blog post and hit publish.. and that gave you a chance to reflect and retract. But now you can tap out a gut reaction to the latest drama and keep the feedback loop going.<p>This is all just based on personal observation and therefore unscientific, but I suspect most communities have similar levels of antagonism between members and topics up for internal conflict. Those communities whose members are communicating more on Twitter, however, have dramas that rumble on for longer and get more external coverage than those sheltered away on private mailing lists and IRC channels.
评论 #6628052 未加载
VLM超过 11 年前
&quot;But every time I see some innocuous tweet spawn another long, bile-filled thread of awfulness, I become less interested in tweeting.&quot;<p>He&#x27;s giving us the answer we all want to hear; what we appeal to. Reality of course is the opposite, and manufactured drama attracts a lot better than education, for example.<p>The article&#x27;s argument is something like if people wanted to learn something they&#x27;d go to wikipedia or stack exchange, but they don&#x27;t, they want to read (manufactured) drama. So twitter makes money off them. It would be a much harder sell for twitter to move into SE or wikipedia&#x27;s turf, so they don&#x27;t and shouldn&#x27;t if they want to make money.
TeMPOraL超过 11 年前
&gt; <i>&quot;If Twitter cared about avoiding arguments, there are so many things they could do: remove the outdated character limit, let us edit tweets, create progressive circles of privacy, don’t let retweets out of our networks, slow the whole thing down, and encourage smaller communities.&quot;</i><p>If they try to do this, they may as well tell their users to move to Facebook and close shop.<p>Twitter is what it is precisely because of, not in spite of, these &quot;limitations&quot;. Like most new media it&#x27;s defined in terms of constraints it has. Without them, Twitter will be no different than everything else.
评论 #6628075 未加载
CurtMonash超过 11 年前
I was hoping this would be a Monty Python reference.
gngeal超过 11 年前
<i>So you set out to create a device that would ensnare normal, rational people and turn them into ranting lunatics.</i><p>You mean like a mosque or a church? <i>ducks</i>
评论 #6626957 未加载
schenecstasy超过 11 年前
How dare he post this on his personal blog? That post is the property of Medium.
评论 #6628014 未加载
auggierose超过 11 年前
Is &quot;supervillian&quot; an actual word?
评论 #6626516 未加载
评论 #6626441 未加载