TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How much revenue top companies earn per second

118 点作者 pjvds超过 11 年前

18 条评论

stbullard超过 11 年前
Summary (note: revenue, not profit) Blackberry: 205 Facebook: 230 Nokia: 941 Oracle: 1068 Cisco: 1594 Intel: 1628 Dell: 1865 Google: 1873 Amazon: 1996 Microsoft: 2331 IBM: 3166 HP: 3459 Foxconn: 3815 Apple: 4540 Samsung: 6486
评论 #6725054 未加载
评论 #6724494 未加载
评论 #6724656 未加载
评论 #6724207 未加载
评论 #6724200 未加载
nraynaud超过 11 年前
It's a bit too bad they compare revenue of resellers like Amazon with editors like Microsoft, the gross margin is really different. Resellers have to punch over their weight to get some money home where Microsoft brings almost everything to the bank.
评论 #6725283 未加载
rayiner超过 11 年前
The interesting thing about this chart is how unprofitable manufacturing is. Foxconn&#x27;s profits are less than $3 billion on $115 billion in revenues (and $50-$60 billion in assets). Google has 3x the profit but less than half the revenue. When people ask why manufacturing has left the U.S., this is the reason why: it doesn&#x27;t offer very good return on capital.<p>On the other hand, Foxconn provides jobs for over 1.2 million people, while Google employs less than 50,000. Also relevant to the debate about manufacturing.
评论 #6725294 未加载
评论 #6726561 未加载
MattBearman超过 11 年前
Interesting to see, and well presented. I&#x27;d be more interested in profit rather than revenue.
评论 #6724236 未加载
评论 #6725179 未加载
z92超过 11 年前
Displaying profit instead of revenue would have been more interesting, &quot;Waooo!!! This company makes more money per second than what I make working a whole month!&quot;
评论 #6724850 未加载
评论 #6734688 未加载
评论 #6724387 未加载
评论 #6725055 未加载
adamnemecek超过 11 年前
Well the order was somewhat unexpected. Surprised about IBM, HP and Dell.
评论 #6724267 未加载
评论 #6724131 未加载
sidcool超过 11 年前
I was a bit surprised to see FoxConn there with such a big revenue.
评论 #6724157 未加载
swalsh超过 11 年前
Revenue is not really interesting. Take Amazon as an example, they make a lot of revenue... but that&#x27;s because they pretty much give away as much money as they can sustain.
rheide超过 11 年前
Would be cool if this had an at-a-glance view with incrementing counters for each company on a single screen, updating proportionally to their revenue.
ekianjo超过 11 年前
Too bad they only presented tech companies. It would be interested to compare Apple vs Shell or BP, just to get an idea of the differences.
评论 #6724120 未加载
评论 #6724113 未加载
rplnt超过 11 年前
The title is missing an important keyword. There are, of course, a lot of companies making much (much) more than this per seconds.<p>Also, how is Foxconn a technology company in the sense the others are? Don&#x27;t they only (as oppsoed to Samsung for example which does that <i>also</i>) manufacture for others, what is designed by others? I really don&#x27;t think they fit the description.
评论 #6726126 未加载
评论 #6724919 未加载
flexie超过 11 年前
Maybe at some point in the future you can actually see real time what companies sell and buy and with whom the transactions are made.
评论 #6725078 未加载
gdilla超过 11 年前
Love this! It&#x27;d be neat if you could enter a stock ticker for any company and see it displayed here.
ohadron超过 11 年前
Make means income or revenue?
评论 #6724098 未加载
fusionflo超过 11 年前
I was expecting to see the big GOOGLE on this list but could not see it?
评论 #6724136 未加载
评论 #6724132 未加载
评论 #6724134 未加载
known超过 11 年前
I propose these companies should adopt&#x2F;donate&#x2F;fund ObamaCare
itsbits超过 11 年前
would have liked to visualize with Bar graph rather long page...
radious超过 11 年前
Somehow this page misses twitter...
评论 #6724454 未加载
评论 #6724186 未加载