TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Quantum Suicide

6 点作者 sabhishek超过 17 年前

4 条评论

mxh超过 17 年前
Does the Copenhagen Interpretation strike anyone else as eerily like lazy evaluation?<p>My other thought is that once you're doing 'thought experiments', you've become rather unmoored from science as I understand it: Observation, Hypothesis, Prediction, Experiment, and so forth. Hopefully, the 'thought experiments' will lead to something testable.
评论 #67574 未加载
joeguilmette超过 17 年前
haha quantum physics may as well be chinese to me. the only explanation that has <i>ever</i> made the least bit of sense is that cartoon with the old man super hero talking about light particles.
majimojo超过 17 年前
Nice movie plot for Jet Li perhaps, but they don't actually explain how to kill yourself in all universes. So, unless you're a cat or Solid Snake, you can get out of that box now.
curi超过 17 年前
They have no clue what they are talking about. For example this:<p><i>This is the same case with quantum suicide. When the man pulls the trigger, there are two possible outcomes: the gun either fires or it doesn't. In this case, the man either lives or he dies. Each time the trigger is pulled, the universe splits to accommodate each possible outcome</i><p>Universes do not split like that. That would mean many universes were being created from nothing every instant. What actually happens is there are <i>already</i> infinitely many "universes" and they <i>become different</i>. And not one per outcome, but in proportion to the probability of outcomes.
评论 #67511 未加载