TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Climate Change Climate Change: The number of skeptics is swelling

12 点作者 zurla将近 16 年前

5 条评论

evolve2k将近 16 年前
This article is useless and skewed. Im from Australia and the senator in question is a known skeptic who benefits from promoting those interests who would have most to loose in a carbon constrained economy. "Skeptics" continue to benefit from saying oh its not happening. A senator taking a (likley) free trip to the US for a conference against climate change, big news!<p>You might find this more informative: <a href="http://wakeupfreakout.org/film/tipping.html" rel="nofollow">http://wakeupfreakout.org/film/tipping.html</a><p>At least you have some facts to check. The wsj article is mere hyperbole.<p>For less bias in the news you read check out newscred.com (no affiliation).
评论 #676656 未加载
评论 #676692 未加载
noodle将近 16 年前
i don't know that any news corp outlet has reported anything to support the notion of climate change.<p>and to be clear, i'm not commenting on the issue itself, just the unbalanced coverage from this specific source.
评论 #676624 未加载
Alex3917将近 16 年前
Not only is this a dupe, it's a dupe from this morning.<p>Today the house passed the most important environmental bill in the nation's history, and that gets zero upvotes in favor of this. Really?
mattmaroon将近 16 年前
Why do these global warming skeptic articles keep popping up here? Global warming is certainly OT, and skeptics' theories are not really any more interesting than any other conspiracy theories.
评论 #676695 未加载
评论 #676635 未加载
评论 #676676 未加载
评论 #676631 未加载
评论 #676634 未加载
TriinT将近 16 年前
It does not matter that the number of skeptics is swelling. It would not matter either if the number of warmists were swelling. Science is about observation, experimentation. Science is not about consensus. The truth does not care about what the ignorant masses think.<p>It does not matter either if the number of skeptic scientists is swelling. What matters is the opinion of the scientists who have studied the global climate. The opinion of the experts is the only one that matters. And since the experts may be wrong, their opinion should be viewed as an opinion, not as an absolute truth.<p>Moreover, I want to stress something important. This is not a game of "us versus them". The truth does not care for such petty human weaknesses. The climate is an extremely difficult problem, and anyone who's too sure of his / her views is probably not a real expert. And scientists should have the freedom to speak what they think, without fearing being attacked by the gullible masses.<p>I finish with a quote by Robert Oppenheimer:<p><i>"There must be no barriers for freedom of inquiry. There is no place for dogma in science. The scientist is free, and must be free to ask any question, to doubt any asssertion, to seek for any evidence, to correct any errors."</i>